Re: [PATCH v4] zswap: replace RB tree with xarray

From: Chengming Zhou
Date: Wed Mar 06 2024 - 21:17:35 EST


On 2024/3/7 05:12, Chris Li wrote:
> Hi Chengming,
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 6:52 PM Chengming Zhou
> <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On 2024/3/5 05:32, Chris Li wrote:
>>> Very deep RB tree requires rebalance at times. That
>>> contributes to the zswap fault latencies. Xarray does not
>>> need to perform tree rebalance. Replacing RB tree to xarray
>>> can have some small performance gain.
>>>
>>> One small difference is that xarray insert might fail with
>>> ENOMEM, while RB tree insert does not allocate additional
>>> memory.
>>>
>>> The zswap_entry size will reduce a bit due to removing the
>>> RB node, which has two pointers and a color field. Xarray
>>> store the pointer in the xarray tree rather than the
>>> zswap_entry. Every entry has one pointer from the xarray
>>> tree. Overall, switching to xarray should save some memory,
>>> if the swap entries are densely packed.
>>>
>>> Notice the zswap_rb_search and zswap_rb_insert always
>>> followed by zswap_rb_erase. Use xa_erase directly. The entry
>>> erase into zswap_xa_insert as well. That saves one tree
>>> lookup as well.
>>>
>>> Remove zswap_invalidate_entry due to no need to call
>>> zswap_rb_erase any more. Use zswap_free_entry instead.
>>>
>>> The "struct zswap_tree" has been replaced by "struct xarray".
>>> The tree spin lock has transferred to the xarray lock.
>>>
>>> Run the kernel build testing 10 times for each version, averages:
>>> (memory.max=2GB, zswap shrinker and writeback enabled, one 50GB swapfile.)
>>>
>>> mm-9a0181a3710eb xarray v4
>>> user 3526.829 3526.930
>>> sys 532.754 526.525
>>> real 198.748 198.850
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - Remove zswap_xa_search_and_earse, use xa_erase directly.
>>> - Move charge of objcg after zswap_xa_insert.
>>> - Avoid erase old entry on insert fail error path.
>>> - Remove not needed swap_zswap_tree change
>>> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240302-zswap-xarray-v3-1-5900252f2302@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Use xa_cmpxchg instead of zswap_xa_search_and_delete in zswap_writeback_entry.
>>> - Use xa_store in zswap_xa_insert directly. Reduce the scope of spinlock.
>>> - Fix xa_store error handling for same page fill case.
>>> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229-zswap-xarray-v2-1-e50284dfcdb1@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Replace struct zswap_tree with struct xarray.
>>> - Remove zswap_tree spinlock, use xarray lock instead.
>>> - Fold zswap_rb_erase() into zswap_xa_search_and_delete() and zswap_xa_insert().
>>> - Delete zswap_invalidate_entry(), use zswap_free_entry() instead.
>>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240117-zswap-xarray-v1-0-6daa86c08fae@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ---
>>> mm/zswap.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
>>> index 011e068eb355..4f4a3f452b76 100644
>>> --- a/mm/zswap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/zswap.c
>>> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>>> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>> #include <linux/atomic.h>
>>> -#include <linux/rbtree.h>
>>> #include <linux/swap.h>
>>> #include <linux/crypto.h>
>>> #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>>> @@ -71,6 +70,8 @@ static u64 zswap_reject_compress_poor;
>>> static u64 zswap_reject_alloc_fail;
>>> /* Store failed because the entry metadata could not be allocated (rare) */
>>> static u64 zswap_reject_kmemcache_fail;
>>> +/* Store failed because xarray can't insert the entry*/
>>> +static u64 zswap_reject_xarray_fail;
>>>
>>> /* Shrinker work queue */
>>> static struct workqueue_struct *shrink_wq;
>>> @@ -196,7 +197,6 @@ static struct {
>>> * This structure contains the metadata for tracking a single compressed
>>> * page within zswap.
>>> *
>>> - * rbnode - links the entry into red-black tree for the appropriate swap type
>>> * swpentry - associated swap entry, the offset indexes into the red-black tree
>>> * length - the length in bytes of the compressed page data. Needed during
>>> * decompression. For a same value filled page length is 0, and both
>>> @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ static struct {
>>> * lru - handle to the pool's lru used to evict pages.
>>> */
>>> struct zswap_entry {
>>> - struct rb_node rbnode;
>>> swp_entry_t swpentry;
>>> unsigned int length;
>>> struct zswap_pool *pool;
>>> @@ -220,12 +219,7 @@ struct zswap_entry {
>>> struct list_head lru;
>>> };
>>>
>>> -struct zswap_tree {
>>> - struct rb_root rbroot;
>>> - spinlock_t lock;
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -static struct zswap_tree *zswap_trees[MAX_SWAPFILES];
>>> +static struct xarray *zswap_trees[MAX_SWAPFILES];
>>> static unsigned int nr_zswap_trees[MAX_SWAPFILES];
>>>
>>> /* RCU-protected iteration */
>>> @@ -253,7 +247,7 @@ static bool zswap_has_pool;
>>> * helpers and fwd declarations
>>> **********************************/
>>>
>>> -static inline struct zswap_tree *swap_zswap_tree(swp_entry_t swp)
>>> +static inline struct xarray *swap_zswap_tree(swp_entry_t swp)
>>> {
>>> return &zswap_trees[swp_type(swp)][swp_offset(swp)
>>> >> SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT];
>>> @@ -805,60 +799,33 @@ void zswap_memcg_offline_cleanup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*********************************
>>> -* rbtree functions
>>> +* xarray functions
>>> **********************************/
>>> -static struct zswap_entry *zswap_rb_search(struct rb_root *root, pgoff_t offset)
>>> -{
>>> - struct rb_node *node = root->rb_node;
>>> - struct zswap_entry *entry;
>>> - pgoff_t entry_offset;
>>> -
>>> - while (node) {
>>> - entry = rb_entry(node, struct zswap_entry, rbnode);
>>> - entry_offset = swp_offset(entry->swpentry);
>>> - if (entry_offset > offset)
>>> - node = node->rb_left;
>>> - else if (entry_offset < offset)
>>> - node = node->rb_right;
>>> - else
>>> - return entry;
>>> - }
>>> - return NULL;
>>> -}
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * In the case that a entry with the same offset is found, a pointer to
>>> - * the existing entry is stored in dupentry and the function returns -EEXIST
>>> + * the existing entry is stored in old and erased from the tree.
>>> + * Function return error on insert.
>>> */
>>> -static int zswap_rb_insert(struct rb_root *root, struct zswap_entry *entry,
>>> - struct zswap_entry **dupentry)
>>> +static int zswap_xa_insert(struct xarray *tree, struct zswap_entry *entry,
>>> + struct zswap_entry **old)
>>> {
>>> - struct rb_node **link = &root->rb_node, *parent = NULL;
>>> - struct zswap_entry *myentry;
>>> - pgoff_t myentry_offset, entry_offset = swp_offset(entry->swpentry);
>>> -
>>> - while (*link) {
>>> - parent = *link;
>>> - myentry = rb_entry(parent, struct zswap_entry, rbnode);
>>> - myentry_offset = swp_offset(myentry->swpentry);
>>> - if (myentry_offset > entry_offset)
>>> - link = &(*link)->rb_left;
>>> - else if (myentry_offset < entry_offset)
>>> - link = &(*link)->rb_right;
>>> - else {
>>> - *dupentry = myentry;
>>> - return -EEXIST;
>>> - }
>>> - }
>>> - rb_link_node(&entry->rbnode, parent, link);
>>> - rb_insert_color(&entry->rbnode, root);
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> + int err;
>>> + struct zswap_entry *e;
>>> + pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(entry->swpentry);
>>>
>>> -static void zswap_rb_erase(struct rb_root *root, struct zswap_entry *entry)
>>> -{
>>> - rb_erase(&entry->rbnode, root);
>>> - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&entry->rbnode);
>>> + e = xa_store(tree, offset, entry, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + err = xa_err(e);
>>> +
>>> + if (err) {
>>> + e = xa_erase(tree, offset);
>>> + if (err == -ENOMEM)
>>> + zswap_reject_alloc_fail++;
>>> + else
>>> + zswap_reject_xarray_fail++;
>>> + }
>>> + *old = e;
>>> + return err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*********************************
>>> @@ -872,7 +839,6 @@ static struct zswap_entry *zswap_entry_cache_alloc(gfp_t gfp, int nid)
>>> entry = kmem_cache_alloc_node(zswap_entry_cache, gfp, nid);
>>> if (!entry)
>>> return NULL;
>>> - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&entry->rbnode);
>>> return entry;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -914,17 +880,6 @@ static void zswap_entry_free(struct zswap_entry *entry)
>>> zswap_update_total_size();
>>> }
>>>
>>> -/*
>>> - * The caller hold the tree lock and search the entry from the tree,
>>> - * so it must be on the tree, remove it from the tree and free it.
>>> - */
>>> -static void zswap_invalidate_entry(struct zswap_tree *tree,
>>> - struct zswap_entry *entry)
>>> -{
>>> - zswap_rb_erase(&tree->rbroot, entry);
>>> - zswap_entry_free(entry);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /*********************************
>>> * compressed storage functions
>>> **********************************/
>>> @@ -1113,7 +1068,9 @@ static void zswap_decompress(struct zswap_entry *entry, struct page *page)
>>> static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zswap_entry *entry,
>>> swp_entry_t swpentry)
>>> {
>>> - struct zswap_tree *tree;
>>> + struct xarray *tree;
>>> + pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(swpentry);
>>> + struct zswap_entry *e;
>>> struct folio *folio;
>>> struct mempolicy *mpol;
>>> bool folio_was_allocated;
>>> @@ -1150,19 +1107,14 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zswap_entry *entry,
>>> * be dereferenced.
>>> */
>>> tree = swap_zswap_tree(swpentry);
>>> - spin_lock(&tree->lock);
>>> - if (zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, swp_offset(swpentry)) != entry) {
>>> - spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
>>> + e = xa_cmpxchg(tree, offset, entry, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (e != entry) {
>>
>> Maybe "if (xa_cmpxchg() != entry)" look better, so "e" variable can be removed,
>> since we don't use it.
>
> I thought about that. The main reason "if (xa_cmpxchg(tree, offset,
> entry, NULL, GFP_KERNEL) != entry)" is a long expression. Having
> != entry at the end of the expression makes it harder to read. Have
> the temporary variable IMHO help reading the comparison.
>
> Not sure I understand the motivation to save a temporary variable. The
> compiler always generates temporary variables internally. Having one
> here does not affect the compiling result at all. It is just there to
> help reading. If you still think it has the reverse effect on reading
> I can of course remove it. It generates the same code anyway.
You are right, just a minor type suggestion, no much difference if you keep it.

>
>>
>>> delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
>>> folio_unlock(folio);
>>> folio_put(folio);
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - /* Safe to deref entry after the entry is verified above. */
>>> - zswap_rb_erase(&tree->rbroot, entry);
>>> - spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
>>> -
>>> zswap_decompress(entry, &folio->page);
>>>
>>> count_vm_event(ZSWPWB);
>>> @@ -1471,10 +1423,12 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
>>> {
>>> swp_entry_t swp = folio->swap;
>>> pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(swp);
>>> - struct zswap_tree *tree = swap_zswap_tree(swp);
>>> - struct zswap_entry *entry, *dupentry;
>>> + struct xarray *tree = swap_zswap_tree(swp);
>>> + struct zswap_entry *entry, *old;
>>> struct obj_cgroup *objcg = NULL;
>>> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
>>> + int err;
>>> + bool old_erased = false;
>>>
>>> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(folio));
>>> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_swapcache(folio));
>>> @@ -1526,6 +1480,7 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
>>> kunmap_local(src);
>>> entry->length = 0;
>>> entry->value = value;
>>> + entry->pool = NULL;
>>> atomic_inc(&zswap_same_filled_pages);
>>> goto insert_entry;
>>> }
>>> @@ -1555,28 +1510,31 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
>>> insert_entry:
>>> entry->swpentry = swp;
>>> entry->objcg = objcg;
>>> - if (objcg) {
>>> - obj_cgroup_charge_zswap(objcg, entry->length);
>>> - /* Account before objcg ref is moved to tree */
>>> - count_objcg_event(objcg, ZSWPOUT);
>>> - }
>>>
>>> /* map */
>>> - spin_lock(&tree->lock);
>>> /*
>>> * The folio may have been dirtied again, invalidate the
>>> * possibly stale entry before inserting the new entry.
>>> */
>>> - if (zswap_rb_insert(&tree->rbroot, entry, &dupentry) == -EEXIST) {
>>> - zswap_invalidate_entry(tree, dupentry);
>>> - WARN_ON(zswap_rb_insert(&tree->rbroot, entry, &dupentry));
>>> + err = zswap_xa_insert(tree, entry, &old);
>>> + if (old)
>>> + zswap_entry_free(old);
>>> + if (err) {
>>> + old_erased = true;
>>> + goto insert_failed;
>>> }
>>
>> It looks a little complicated for me :( How do you think this like below?
>>
>> old = xa_store(tree, offset, entry, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (xa_is_err(old))
>
> Might want to bump up the ENOMEM error count if it is out of memory
> since zswap tracks it.

Right.

>
>> goto store_failed;
>>
>> if (old)
>> zswap_entry_free(old);
>>
>> Then zswap_xa_insert() wrapper can be removed since no use elsewhere.
>> So the error handling path is kept much the same as before and simpler.
>
> Sure.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + if (objcg) {
>>> + obj_cgroup_charge_zswap(objcg, entry->length);
>>> + /* Account before objcg ref is moved to tree */
>>> + count_objcg_event(objcg, ZSWPOUT);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (entry->length) {
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->lru);
>>> zswap_lru_add(&zswap.list_lru, entry);
>>> atomic_inc(&zswap.nr_stored);
>>> }
>>> - spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
>>>
>>> /* update stats */
>>> atomic_inc(&zswap_stored_pages);
>>> @@ -1585,6 +1543,12 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
>>>
>>> return true;
>>>
>>> +insert_failed:
>>> + if (!entry->length) {
>>> + atomic_dec(&zswap_same_filled_pages);
>>> + goto freepage;
>>> + }
>>> + zpool_free(zswap_find_zpool(entry), entry->handle);
>>
>> entry->pool can be used here instead of zswap_find_zpool().
>
> Ack.
>
> I was following the code in zswap_entry_free(). Does it mean the
> zswap_find_zpool(entry) can also use entry->pool?

Ah, I just see your other email, you are right, this is zpool.

Thanks.

>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Chris
>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> put_pool:
>>> zswap_pool_put(entry->pool);
>>> freepage:
>>> @@ -1592,17 +1556,19 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
>>> reject:
>>> if (objcg)
>>> obj_cgroup_put(objcg);
>>> +
>>> + if (old_erased)
>>> + goto failed;
>>> check_old:
>>> /*
>>> * If the zswap store fails or zswap is disabled, we must invalidate the
>>> * possibly stale entry which was previously stored at this offset.
>>> * Otherwise, writeback could overwrite the new data in the swapfile.
>>> */
>>> - spin_lock(&tree->lock);
>>> - entry = zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, offset);
>>> + entry = xa_erase(tree, offset);
>>> if (entry)
>>> - zswap_invalidate_entry(tree, entry);
>>> - spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
>>> + zswap_entry_free(entry);
>>> +failed:
>>> return false;
>>>
>>> shrink:
>>> @@ -1615,20 +1581,15 @@ bool zswap_load(struct folio *folio)
>>> swp_entry_t swp = folio->swap;
>>> pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(swp);
>>> struct page *page = &folio->page;
>>> - struct zswap_tree *tree = swap_zswap_tree(swp);
>>> + struct xarray *tree = swap_zswap_tree(swp);
>>> struct zswap_entry *entry;
>>> u8 *dst;
>>>
>>> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(folio));
>>>
>>> - spin_lock(&tree->lock);
>>> - entry = zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, offset);
>>> - if (!entry) {
>>> - spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
>>> + entry = xa_erase(tree, offset);
>>> + if (!entry)
>>> return false;
>>> - }
>>> - zswap_rb_erase(&tree->rbroot, entry);
>>> - spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
>>>
>>> if (entry->length)
>>> zswap_decompress(entry, page);
>>> @@ -1652,19 +1613,17 @@ bool zswap_load(struct folio *folio)
>>> void zswap_invalidate(swp_entry_t swp)
>>> {
>>> pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(swp);
>>> - struct zswap_tree *tree = swap_zswap_tree(swp);
>>> + struct xarray *tree = swap_zswap_tree(swp);
>>> struct zswap_entry *entry;
>>>
>>> - spin_lock(&tree->lock);
>>> - entry = zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, offset);
>>> + entry = xa_erase(tree, offset);
>>> if (entry)
>>> - zswap_invalidate_entry(tree, entry);
>>> - spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
>>> + zswap_entry_free(entry);
>>> }
>>>
>>> int zswap_swapon(int type, unsigned long nr_pages)
>>> {
>>> - struct zswap_tree *trees, *tree;
>>> + struct xarray *trees, *tree;
>>> unsigned int nr, i;
>>>
>>> nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages, SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES);
>>> @@ -1674,11 +1633,8 @@ int zswap_swapon(int type, unsigned long nr_pages)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>>> - tree = trees + i;
>>> - tree->rbroot = RB_ROOT;
>>> - spin_lock_init(&tree->lock);
>>> - }
>>> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
>>> + xa_init(trees + i);
>>>
>>> nr_zswap_trees[type] = nr;
>>> zswap_trees[type] = trees;
>>> @@ -1687,7 +1643,7 @@ int zswap_swapon(int type, unsigned long nr_pages)
>>>
>>> void zswap_swapoff(int type)
>>> {
>>> - struct zswap_tree *trees = zswap_trees[type];
>>> + struct xarray *trees = zswap_trees[type];
>>> unsigned int i;
>>>
>>> if (!trees)
>>> @@ -1695,7 +1651,7 @@ void zswap_swapoff(int type)
>>>
>>> /* try_to_unuse() invalidated all the entries already */
>>> for (i = 0; i < nr_zswap_trees[type]; i++)
>>> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&trees[i].rbroot));
>>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_empty(trees + i));
>>>
>>> kvfree(trees);
>>> nr_zswap_trees[type] = 0;
>>> @@ -1727,6 +1683,8 @@ static int zswap_debugfs_init(void)
>>> zswap_debugfs_root, &zswap_reject_kmemcache_fail);
>>> debugfs_create_u64("reject_compress_fail", 0444,
>>> zswap_debugfs_root, &zswap_reject_compress_fail);
>>> + debugfs_create_u64("reject_xarray_fail", 0444,
>>> + zswap_debugfs_root, &zswap_reject_xarray_fail);
>>> debugfs_create_u64("reject_compress_poor", 0444,
>>> zswap_debugfs_root, &zswap_reject_compress_poor);
>>> debugfs_create_u64("written_back_pages", 0444,
>>>
>>> ---
>>> base-commit: 9a0181a3710eba1f5c6d19eadcca888be3d54e4f
>>> change-id: 20240104-zswap-xarray-716260e541e3
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>