Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-sai: allow only one dma-names

[Frank Li]

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:45:34PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 02:25:53PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 06:45:13PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:33:04PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > Some sai only connect one direction dma (rx/tx) in SOC. For example:
> > > > imx8qxp sai5 only connect tx dma channel. So allow only one "rx" or "tx"
> > > > for dma-names.
> > > > 
> > > > Remove description under dmas because no user use index to get dma channel.
> > > > All user use 'dma-names' to get correct dma channel. dma-names already in
> > > > 'required' list.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml | 13 ++++++-------
> > > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > > > index 2456d958adeef..6f551c68d33db 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > > > @@ -81,15 +81,14 @@ properties:
> > > >  
> > > >    dmas:
> > > >      minItems: 1
> > > > -    items:
> > > > -      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for RX
> > > > -      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for TX
> > > > +    maxItems: 2
> > > >  
> > > >    dma-names:
> > > > -    minItems: 1
> > > > -    items:
> > > > -      - const: rx
> > > > -      - const: tx
> > > > +    oneOf:
> > > > +      - items:
> > > > +          - const: rx
> > > > +          - const: tx
> > > > +      - enum: [ rx, tx ]
> > > 
> > > I'm not entirely sure if this was Rob's suggestion, I got the impression
> > > he was suggesting that in the two items case we'd not care about the
> > > order. But while I think this is different to that suggestion it's also
> > > not wrong.
> > 
> > I log this at cover-letter. b4 can't support write change log at every
> > patch yet. Rob's suggest was not work. dt-binding check complain too long
> > if there are two dma-names = "rx", "tx". 
> 
> Yeh, that is what happens if you just have
> dma-names:
>   enum: [ rx, tx ]
> since that only allows one entry. Take a look at st,stm32-uart.yaml
> instead, for example.

Yes, it works. Thank you very much. I will update it at next version.

Frank