Re: [PATCH 6.7 000/163] 6.7.9-rc2 review

[Luna Jernberg]

Den tis 5 mars 2024 kl 10:34 skrev Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:21:46AM +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > Den tis 5 mars 2024 kl 10:20 skrev Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:07:37AM +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > > > Den tis 5 mars 2024 kl 09:32 skrev Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:58:57AM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.7.9 release.
> > > > > > There are 163 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > > let me know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Mar 2024 07:46:26 +0000.
> > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >     riscv: Save/restore envcfg CSR during CPU suspend
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >     riscv: Add a custom ISA extension for the [ms]envcfg CSR
> > > > >
> > > > > I left a comment in response to the off-list email about this patch,
> > > > > I don't think it's gonna work as the number this custom extension has
> > > > > been given exceeds the max in 6.7/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >     riscv: Fix enabling cbo.zero when running in M-mode
> > > >
> > > > Works fine on my Arch Linux desktop with model name    : AMD Ryzen 5
> > > > 5600 6-Core Processor
> > > > after the Arch Linux manual intervention for new mkinitcpio settings
> > > > and version in Arch
> > > >
> > > > Tested by: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > This problem is riscv only, your x86 machine should not be affected
> > > by it.
> >
> > Ah alright then i know, did feel like compiling the latest test kernel
> > anyways, but thanks for the heads up
>
> Ah, I understand now. You meant to reply saying that you had tested
> 6.7.9-rc2 but you replied to me instead of Greg's original posting which
> confused me into thinking you tried to test these specific patches.
>

Yeah sorry i did reply all in Gmail, maybe should just only have
replied to Greg and the mailinglist sorry for the confusion