Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

[Guenter Roeck]

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[ ...]

>
> And singling out DRM because it regularly allegedly breaks things on
> xtensa or m68k and claiming we're not taking CI seriously because of it
> is completely ridiculous. If the all the subsystems were taking CI as
> seriously as DRM, we would be in a much better place.
>

FWIW:

$ git grep CONFIG_DRM arch/xtensa/ arch/m68k/
arch/m68k/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM=y
arch/m68k/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION=y
arch/m68k/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_VIRTIO_GPU=y
arch/xtensa/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM=y
arch/xtensa/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_VGEM=y
arch/xtensa/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_VIRTIO_GPU=y

If that isn't supported, it might really make sense to declare that
CONFIG_DRM depends on !xtensa and !m68k.

Guenter