Re: [PATCH v3] driver core: Cancel scheduled pm_runtime_idle() on device removal

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Mon Mar 04 2024 - 10:51:50 EST


On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:38:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 7:23 AM Kai-Heng Feng
> <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > When inserting an SD7.0 card to Realtek card reader, the card reader
> > unplugs itself and morph into a NVMe device. The slot Link down on hot
> > unplugged can cause the following error:
> >
> > pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: pciehp: Slot(8): Link Down
> > BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffb24d403e5010
> > PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 1001fe067 PMD 100d97067 PTE 0
> > Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> > CPU: 3 PID: 534 Comm: kworker/3:10 Not tainted 6.4.0 #6
> > Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./H370M Pro4, BIOS P3.40 10/25/2018
> > Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
> > RIP: 0010:ioread32+0x2e/0x70
> ...
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > ? show_regs+0x68/0x70
> > ? __die_body+0x20/0x70
> > ? __die+0x2b/0x40
> > ? page_fault_oops+0x160/0x480
> > ? search_bpf_extables+0x63/0x90
> > ? ioread32+0x2e/0x70
> > ? search_exception_tables+0x5f/0x70
> > ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0xa2/0x120
> > ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x179/0x230
> > ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x16/0x20
> > ? do_kern_addr_fault+0x8b/0xa0
> > ? exc_page_fault+0xe5/0x180
> > ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
> > ? ioread32+0x2e/0x70
> > ? rtsx_pci_write_register+0x5b/0x90 [rtsx_pci]
> > rtsx_set_l1off_sub+0x1c/0x30 [rtsx_pci]
> > rts5261_set_l1off_cfg_sub_d0+0x36/0x40 [rtsx_pci]
> > rtsx_pci_runtime_idle+0xc7/0x160 [rtsx_pci]
> > ? __pfx_pci_pm_runtime_idle+0x10/0x10
> > pci_pm_runtime_idle+0x34/0x70
> > rpm_idle+0xc4/0x2b0
> > pm_runtime_work+0x93/0xc0
> > process_one_work+0x21a/0x430
> > worker_thread+0x4a/0x3c0
> ...

> > This happens because scheduled pm_runtime_idle() is not cancelled.
>
> But rpm_resume() changes dev->power.request to RPM_REQ_NONE and if
> pm_runtime_work() sees this, it will not run rpm_idle().
>
> However, rpm_resume() doesn't deactivate the autosuspend timer if it
> is running (see the comment in rpm_resume() regarding this), so it may
> queue up a runtime PM work later.
>
> If this is not desirable, you need to stop the autosuspend timer
> explicitly in addition to calling pm_runtime_get_sync().

I don't quite follow all this. I think the race is between
rtsx_pci_remove() (not resume) and rtsx_pci_runtime_idle().

rtsx_pci_remove()
{
pm_runtime_get_sync()
pm_runtime_forbid()
...

If this is an rtsx bug, what exactly should be added to
rtsx_pci_remove()?

Is there ever a case where we want any runtime PM work to happen
during or after a driver .remove()? If not, maybe the driver core
should prevent that, which I think is basically what this patch does.

If this is an rtsx driver bug, I'm concerned there may be many other
drivers with a similar issue. rtsx exercises this path more than most
because the device switches between card reader and NVMe SSD using
hotplug add/remove based on whether an SD card is inserted (see [1]).

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231019143504.GA25140@xxxxxxxxx

> > So before releasing the device, stop all runtime power managements by
> > using pm_runtime_barrier() to fix the issue.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2ce258f371234b1f8a1a470d5488d00e@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Cc: Ricky Wu <ricky_wu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > Move the change the device driver core.
> >
> > v2:
> > Cover more cases than just pciehp.
> >
> > drivers/base/dd.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > index 85152537dbf1..38c815e2b3a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > @@ -1244,6 +1244,7 @@ static void __device_release_driver(struct device *dev, struct device *parent)
> >
> > drv = dev->driver;
> > if (drv) {
> > + pm_runtime_barrier(dev);
>
> This prevents the crash from occurring because pm_runtime_barrier()
> calls pm_runtime_deactivate_timer() unconditionally AFAICS.