Re: [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[Andi Shyti]

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:58:11AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> "i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us" has flaws in itself and the usage here is
> all wrong. The driver doesn't use it as a maximum time for clock
> stretching but the maximum time for a total transfer. We already have
> a binding for the latter. Convert the wrong binding from examples.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
> index 70fb69b923c4..b1d7d14c0be4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
> @@ -96,6 +96,6 @@ examples:
>          interrupts = <43 2>;
>          interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
>          clock-frequency = <400000>;
> -        i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us = <10000>;
> +        i2c-transfer-timeout-us = <10000>;

Chris, can you please give it an ack?

The whole series is coherent to this change.

Andi