Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/fair: Limit access to overutilized

[Qais Yousef]

On 02/29/24 10:16, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:

> > Is the fact these two share the cacheline is part of the problem? From patch
> > 1 it seems the fact that overutlized is updated often on different cpus is the
> > problem? Did you try to move overutlized to different places to see if this
> > alternatively helps?
> > 
> > The patches look fine to me. I am just trying to verify that indeed the access
> > to overutilzed is the problem, not something else being on the same cacheline
> > is accidentally being slowed down, which means the problem can resurface in the
> > future.
> > 
> 
> We did explicit cachealign for overload. By doing that newidle_balance goes away from
> perf profile. But enqueue_task_fair still remains. That because there is load-store 

I don't have a solution, but this accidental dependency is something to ponder
for the future..

> tearing happening on overutilized field alone due to different CPUs accessing and 
> updating it at the same time. 
> 
> We have also verified that rq->rd->overutilized in enqueue_task_fair path is the reason
> for it showing up in perf profile. 

Something to ponder as well. Maybe this is better converted to a per-cpu
variable if it can cause such cacheline bouncing. But that's probably not good
enough on its own.

Anyway. Something to ponder for the future too. I think the current definition
of overutilized is due for a revisit and I'll keep this problem in mind if we
can introduce a friendlier pattern.


Thanks

--
Qais Yousef