[PATCH net-next 11/21] rxrpc: Don't pick values out of the wire header when setting up security

[David Howells]

Don't pick values out of the wire header in rxkad when setting up DATA
packet security, but rather use other sources.  This makes it easier to get
rid of txb->wire.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 net/rxrpc/rxkad.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
index e451ac90bfee..ef0849c8329c 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet_auth(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
 
 	_enter("");
 
-	check = txb->seq ^ ntohl(txb->wire.callNumber);
+	check = txb->seq ^ call->call_id;
 	hdr->data_size = htonl((u32)check << 16 | txb->len);
 
 	txb->len += sizeof(struct rxkad_level1_hdr);
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet_encrypt(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
 
 	_enter("");
 
-	check = txb->seq ^ ntohl(txb->wire.callNumber);
+	check = txb->seq ^ call->call_id;
 
 	rxkhdr->data_size = htonl(txb->len | (u32)check << 16);
 	rxkhdr->checksum = 0;
@@ -362,9 +362,9 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb)
 	memcpy(&iv, call->conn->rxkad.csum_iv.x, sizeof(iv));
 
 	/* calculate the security checksum */
-	x = (ntohl(txb->wire.cid) & RXRPC_CHANNELMASK) << (32 - RXRPC_CIDSHIFT);
+	x = (call->cid & RXRPC_CHANNELMASK) << (32 - RXRPC_CIDSHIFT);
 	x |= txb->seq & 0x3fffffff;
-	crypto.buf[0] = txb->wire.callNumber;
+	crypto.buf[0] = htonl(call->call_id);
 	crypto.buf[1] = htonl(x);
 
 	sg_init_one(&sg, crypto.buf, 8);