Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: SEV: publish supported VMSA features

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 2/23/24 17:07, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> And unless dead code elimination isn't as effective as I think it is,
> we don't even need any stubs since sev_guest() and sev_es_guest()
> are __always_inline specifically so that useless code can be elided.
> Or if we want to avoid use of IS_ENABLED(), we could add four stubs,
> which is still well worth it.

This particular #ifdef was needed to avoid a compilation failure, but 
I'll check your patches and include them.

Paolo