Re: (subset) [linux][PATCH v6 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

[Lee Jones]

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 08:30:38AM +0000, Dharma.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hi Lee,
> > 
> > On 20/02/24 1:50 pm, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Dharma.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Hi Krzysztof,
> > >>
> > >> On 12/02/24 3:53 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > >>>
> > >>> On 08/02/2024 11:43, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >>>> On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 05:47:33 +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> > >>>>> Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT schema format.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Align clocks and clock-names properties to clearly indicate that the LCD
> > >>>>> controller expects lvds_pll_clk when interfaced with the lvds display. This
> > >>>>> alignment with the specific hardware requirements ensures accurate device tree
> > >>>>> configuration for systems utilizing the HLCDC IP.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [...]
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Applied, thanks!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format
> > >>>>         commit: cb946db1335b599ece363d33966bf653ed0fa58a
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Next is still failing.
> > >>>
> > >>> Dharma,
> > >>> You must explain and clearly mark dependencies between patches.
> > >>
> > >> I sincerely apologize for any confusion caused by the oversight. I have
> > >> organized the patches according to their dependencies in the patch
> > >> series, but unfortunately, I neglected to explicitly mention these
> > >> dependencies. I understand the importance of clear communication in our
> > >> collaborative efforts. Please feel free to provide guidance on how I can
> > >> assist you further in resolving this matter.
> > > 
> > > If this continues to be an issue, I can just remove the commit.
> > 
> > There won't be any issue if both pwm and display binding goes before the 
> > mfd binding.
> > 
> > Could you please pick the display binding as well?
> 
> As this is still not resolved, I've applied the display binding. Not 
> ideal, but should fix next.

Works for me.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]