Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] lib/bitmap: Introduce bitmap_scatter() and bitmap_gather() helpers

From: Herve Codina
Date: Fri Feb 23 2024 - 05:08:19 EST


Andy, Yury,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:50:48 -0800
Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:49:59PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > Hi Andy, Yury,
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:39:27 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > > > + * bitmap_scatter() for the bitmap scatter detailed operations).
> > >
> > > > + * Suppose scattered computed using bitmap_scatter(scattered, src, mask, n).
> > > > + * The operation bitmap_gather(result, scattered, mask, n) leads to a result
> > > > + * equal or equivalent to src.
> > >
> > > This paragraph...
> > >
> > > > + * The result can be 'equivalent' because bitmap_scatter() and bitmap_gather()
> > > > + * are not bijective.
> > >
> > >
> > > > + * The result and src values are equivalent in that sense that a call to
> > > > + * bitmap_scatter(res, src, mask, n) and a call to bitmap_scatter(res, result,
> > > > + * mask, n) will lead to the same res value.
> > >
> > > ...seems duplicating this one.
> > >
> > > I would drop the latter one.
> >
> > I would like to give details about the 'equivalent' in this scatter/gather case.
>
> If you would like - please do! :)
>
> > If Yury is ok, I can drop this last paragraph.
>
> The original bitmap_onto() description is 3 times longer, and barely
> that descriptive. I'm OK with your working and especially pictures.
>

Right, I will keep my last paragraph in the next iteration.

Regards,
Hervé