Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: usb: typec-tcpci: add tcpci fallback binding

[Marco Felsch]

On 24-02-22, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 24-02-22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 15/02/2024 22:28, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > The NXP PTN5110 [1] is an TCPCI [2] compatible chip, so add the fallback
> > > binding.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/PTN5110.pdf
> > > [2] https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/documents/usb-port_controller_specification_rev2.0_v1.0_0.pdf
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > - rephrase commit message
> > > 
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml
> > > index eaedb4cc6b6c..7bd7bbbac9e0 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml
> > > @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ maintainers:
> > >  
> > >  properties:
> > >    compatible:
> > > -    const: nxp,ptn5110
> > > +    enum:
> > > +      - nxp,ptn5110
> > > +      - tcpci
> > 
> > That's not a fallback, but enum. Fallback is "items" and then you could
> 
> Damn, you're right. Sorry.
> 
> > also send a follow-up patchset (separate, so Greg won't take it) fixing
> > DTS (if not, let me know, so I will fix it).
> 
> Sry. but I don't get this. Why do I need to send a follow-up? Greg did
> not apply anything, at least I didn't received an e-mail, that this
> patchset was picked.

Got it now and made it this way.

Regards,
  Marco