Re: [RFC 4/5] sbm: fix up calls to dynamic memory allocators

[Dave Hansen]

On 2/22/24 09:57, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> * Hardware designers are adding (other) hardware security defenses to
>   ring-0 that are not applied to ring-3.
> 
>   Could you give an example of these other security defenses, please?

Here's one example:

> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/data-dependent-prefetcher.html

"DDP is neither trained by nor triggered by supervisor-mode accesses."

But seriously, this is going to be my last message on this topic.  I
appreciate your enthusiasm, but I don't see any viable way forward for
this approach.