Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: sg_miter does not need to be atomic

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Feb 22 2024 - 04:19:28 EST


Hi Linus,

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:23 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All the sglist iterations happen in the *threaded* interrupt handler
> and that context is not atomic, so don't request an atomic
> sglist miter. Using an atomic miter results in "BUG: scheduling while
> atomic" splats.
>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 27b57277d9ba ("mmc: sh_mmcif: Use sg_miter for PIO")
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hi Geert, it'd be great if you could test this!

Done before (see the Tb above ;-)

You probably still want to s/does not need to/must not/?
(sorry, I miswrote that previously)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68korg

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds