Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Fix setup_xfer_req invocation

From: Can Guo
Date: Wed Feb 21 2024 - 21:06:08 EST




On 2/22/2024 1:55 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 2/21/24 01:13, Can Guo wrote:
I am going to push some BUG fixes for Qualcomm UFSHCI MCQ engine, one of which would count on a vops in ufshcd_send_command(). My original plan was to add a new vops.mcq_setup_xfer_req() to differentiate from the existing one used in legacy mode. But if Rohit moves the existing .setup_xfer_req() up, I can use it instead of introducing the new one.

Hi Can,

If an if-statement can be avoided in the hot path by introducing a new
callback pointer for MCQ code then I prefer the approach of introducing
a new callback instead of moving the setup_xfer_req() call.

Hi Bart,

The if-statement you are mentioning here, is it the if (hba->vops && hba->vops->setup_xfer_req) or if (is_mcq_enabled(hba))?

Thanks,

Can Guo.


Thanks,

Bart.