Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/28] riscv: Implementing "PROT_SHADOWSTACK" on riscv

[Deepak Gupta]

On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 08:44:35PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 22:21 -0800, debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > +       /*
> > +        * PROT_SHADOWSTACK is a kernel only protection flag on risc-
> > v.
> > +        * mmap doesn't expect PROT_SHADOWSTACK to be set by user
> > space.
> > +        * User space can rely on `map_shadow_stack` syscall to
> > create
> > +        * shadow stack pages.
> > +        */
> > +       if (unlikely(prot & PROT_SHADOWSTACK))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
>
> Are you sure you need PROT_SHADOWSTACK? Since you are passing
> VM_SHADOW_STACK into do_mmap() directly.

Sorry for (very) late response.
In this patch series since VM_SHADOW_STACK was an alias to VM_WRITE.
And that's why I needed PROT_SHADOWSTACK to disambiguate.

I am updating my patches and going with ARCH_5 bit (and thus only 64bit support).
So x86, aarch64 and risc-v will be using same bit position.