Re: [PATCH v4] bpf: Replace bpf_lpm_trie_key 0-length array with flexible array

[Kees Cook]

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:39:55PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> The build in BPF CI is still broken, did you try to build selftests?

Okay, I give up. How is a mortal supposed to build these?

If I try to follow what I see in
https://github.com/libbpf/ci/blob/main/build-selftests/build_selftests.sh
I just get more and more kinds of errors:

In file included from progs/cb_refs.c:5:
progs/../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h:29:8: error: redefinition of 'prog_test_pass1'
   29 | struct prog_test_pass1 {
      |        ^
/srv/code/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/vmlinux.h:106850:8: note: previous definition is
 here
 106850 | struct prog_test_pass1 {
        |        ^

Messing around with deleting vmlinux.h seems to get me further, but later:

/srv/code/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c: In function 'bpf_testmod_ops_is_valid_access':
/srv/code/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:535:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  535 |         return bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

and then I'm stuck. It looks like the build isn't actually using
KBUILD_OUTPUT for finding includes. If I try to add -I flags to the
Makefile I just drown in new errors.

-- 
Kees Cook