Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: exec_op helper functions return type fixes

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Wed Feb 21 2024 - 11:02:54 EST




On 2/21/2024 12:32 AM, 'Miquel Raynal' via BCM-KERNEL-FEEDBACK-LIST,PDL wrote:
Hi,

dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:16:31 +0300:

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:02:40AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:

william.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:22:56 -0800:
From: David Regan <dregan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

fix return type for exec_op reset and status detect helper functions

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2023-December/102423.html
Fixes: 3c8260ce7663 ("mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: exec_op implementation")
Signed-off-by: David Regan <dregan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

By the way, a Cc: stable tag might be useful as otherwise you may leak
an error code in a status value (which is a bug). And move this patch
first in your series so we're sure it does not conflict with any of the
other patches and can be backported more easily.

The original commit 3c8260ce7663 ("mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: exec_op
implementation") is not in stable so we should be okay on this.

Right.

However please send again this patch quickly so I can queue it up
before the rest of the series.

Also just to be clear, please do not omit the Fixes: tag, even if the commit being fixed is not yet in any released kernel, it is valuable to have that information, for say, people who might consider backporting features into specific kernel versions. The stable team's tooling should be able to figure out that it is not required to pick up that fix since the offending commit is not in a released kernel yet anyway.

Thanks!
--
Florian

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature