Re: [PATCH 00/30] PREEMPT_AUTO: support lazy rescheduling

[Ankur Arora]

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 13 2024 at 20:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 12 2024 at 21:55, Ankur Arora wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This series adds a new scheduling model PREEMPT_AUTO, which like
>>> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC allows dynamic switching between a none/voluntary/full
>>> preemption model. However, unlike PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, it doesn't depend
>>> on explicit preemption points for the voluntary models.
>>>
>>> The series is based on Thomas' original proposal which he outlined
>>> in [1], [2] and in his PoC [3].
>>>
>>> An earlier RFC version is at [4].
>
> Aside of the nitpicks from me and Mark this really looks promising!

Thanks, I had great material to work with.

--
ankur