[PATCH net-next v5] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages

From: Praveen Kumar Kannoju
Date: Wed Feb 21 2024 - 00:08:51 EST


Through the routine bond_mii_monitor(), bonding driver inspects and commits
the slave state changes. During the times when slave state change and
failure in aqcuiring rtnl lock happen at the same time, the routine
bond_mii_monitor() reschedules itself to come around after 1 msec to commit
the new state.

During this, it executes the routine bond_miimon_inspect() to re-inspect
the state chane and prints the corresponding slave state on to the console.
Hence we do see a message at every 1 msec till the rtnl lock is acquired
and state chage is committed.

This patch doesn't change how bond functions. It only simply limits this
kind of log flood.

Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <praveen.kannoju@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v5:
- Redundant indentation addressed.
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240220050437.5623-1-praveen.kannoju@xxxxxxxxxx/
- Rectification in the patch subject and versioning details.
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240219133721.4567-1-praveen.kannoju@xxxxxxxxxx/
- Commit message is modified to provide summary of the issue, because of
which rate-limiting the bonding driver messages is needed.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240215172554.4211-1-praveen.kannoju@xxxxxxxxxx/
- Use exising net_ratelimit() instead of introducing new rate-limit
parameter.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240214044245.33170-1-praveen.kannoju@xxxxxxxxxx/
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 4e0600c..c8482cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2609,12 +2609,12 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_FAIL);
commit++;
slave->delay = bond->params.downdelay;
- if (slave->delay) {
+ if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down for %sinterface, disabling it in %d ms\n",
(BOND_MODE(bond) ==
- BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
- (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
- "active " : "backup ") : "",
+ BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
+ (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
+ "active " : "backup ") : "",
bond->params.downdelay * bond->params.miimon);
}
fallthrough;
@@ -2623,9 +2623,10 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
/* recovered before downdelay expired */
bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_UP);
slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up again after %d ms\n",
- (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
- bond->params.miimon);
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up again after %d ms\n",
+ (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
+ bond->params.miimon);
commit++;
continue;
}
@@ -2647,7 +2648,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
commit++;
slave->delay = bond->params.updelay;

- if (slave->delay) {
+ if (slave->delay && net_ratelimit()) {
slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up, enabling it in %d ms\n",
ignore_updelay ? 0 :
bond->params.updelay *
@@ -2657,9 +2658,10 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
case BOND_LINK_BACK:
if (!link_state) {
bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_DOWN);
- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down again after %d ms\n",
- (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
- bond->params.miimon);
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down again after %d ms\n",
+ (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
+ bond->params.miimon);
commit++;
continue;
}
--
1.8.3.1