Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm: protect against locality counter underflow

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Tue Feb 20, 2024 at 8:54 PM UTC, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> for (i = 0; i <= MAX_LOCALITY; i++)
> 	__tpm_tis_relinquish_locality(priv, i);

I'm pretty unfamiliar with Intel TXT so asking a dummy question:
if Intel TXT uses locality 2 I suppose we should not try to
relinquish it, or?

AFAIK, we don't have a symbol called MAX_LOCALITY.

BR, Jarkko