Re: [PATCH v2] drm/dp: move intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() to generic helper

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Tue Feb 20 2024 - 14:17:45 EST


On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:09, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2024 11:05 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by other DRM drivers as well.
> >>>> Lets move this to drm_dp_helper to achieve this.
> >>>>
> >>>> changes in v2:
> >>>> - rebased on top of drm-tip
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> v1 had an explicit comment before the ack:
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, I remember the comment. I did not make any changes to v2 other than
> >> just rebasing it on drm-tip to get the ack from i915 folks.
> >>
> >>>> From my side, with the promise of the size fixup.
> >>>
> >>> However I observe neither a second patch removing the size argument
> >>> nor it being dropped as a part of this patch.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, now that in v2 we got the ack for this patch, I can spin a v3 with
> >> the addition of the next patch to remove the size OR as another series
> >> so as to not block the main series which needs this patch.
> >>
> >> I would prefer the latter.
> >
> > It doesn't work this way. The comment should have been fixed for v2.
> >
>
> Ack, I can post a v3 now by adding the removal in patch 2 of this series.

Yes, please.

--
With best wishes
Dmitry