Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/5] dt-bindings: clock: histb-clock: Add missing common clock and Hi3798MV200 specific clock definition

From: Yang Xiwen
Date: Tue Feb 20 2024 - 09:09:34 EST


On 2/20/2024 6:10 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 17/02/2024 13:52, Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@xxxxxxxxxxx>

According to the datasheet, some clocks are missing, add their
definitions first.

Some aliases for hi3798mv200 are also introduced.

Signed-off-by: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/dt-bindings/clock/histb-clock.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/histb-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/histb-clock.h
index e64e5770ada6..68a53053586a 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/histb-clock.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/histb-clock.h
@@ -58,6 +58,27 @@
#define HISTB_USB3_UTMI_CLK1 48
#define HISTB_USB3_PIPE_CLK1 49
#define HISTB_USB3_SUSPEND_CLK1 50
+#define HISTB_SDIO1_BIU_CLK 51
+#define HISTB_SDIO1_CIU_CLK 52
+#define HISTB_SDIO1_DRV_CLK 53
+#define HISTB_SDIO1_SAMPLE_CLK 54
+#define HISTB_ETH0_PHY_CLK 55
+#define HISTB_ETH1_PHY_CLK 56
+#define HISTB_WDG0_CLK 57
+#define HISTB_USB2_UTMI0_CLK HISTB_USB2_UTMI_CLK
Why? It's anyway placed oddly, the entries are ordered by number/value.


So this is somewhat broken at the beginning. It named after histb-clock.h but actually they are all clocks for Hi3798CV200 SoC. For Hi3798MV200(also a HiSTB SoC), there is one additional UTMI clock.


What solution do you prefer? rename UTMI_CLK to UTMI0_CLK, add UTMI1_CLK after it and increment all the indexes after it? Then the diff would be very ugly.



+#define HISTB_USB2_UTMI1_CLK 58
+#define HISTB_USB3_REF_CLK 59
+#define HISTB_USB3_GM_CLK 60
+#define HISTB_USB3_GS_CLK 61
+
+/* Hi3798MV200 specific clocks */
+
+// reuse clocks of histb
Don't mix comment styles.

+#define HI3798MV200_GMAC_CLK HISTB_ETH0_MAC_CLK
+#define HI3798MV200_GMACIF_CLK HISTB_ETH0_MACIF_CLK
+#define HI3798MV200_FEMAC_CLK HISTB_ETH1_MAC_CLK
+#define HI3798MV200_FEMACIF_CLK HISTB_ETH1_MACIF_CLK
+#define HI3798MV200_FEPHY_CLK HISTB_ETH1_PHY_CLK
I don't understand what do you want to achieve here. Clock IDs start
from 0 or 1.



Best regards,
Krzysztof


--
Regards,
Yang Xiwen