Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] pwm: dwc: drop redundant error check

From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Mon Feb 19 2024 - 02:27:58 EST


Hello,

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 08:11:00AM +0100, Thorsten Scherer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 09:08:33AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > pcim_iomap_table() fails only if pcim_iomap_regions() fails. No need to
> > check for failure if the latter is already successful.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
> > index c0e586688e57..7dbb72c80ef5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
> > @@ -51,11 +51,8 @@ static int dwc_pwm_probe(struct pci_dev *pci, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > + /* No need to check for failure, pcim_iomap_regions() does it for us. */
>
> IMHO this comment could be omitted.

I like the comment (and even asked for it). Is it really only me who
doesn't know that after pcim_iomap_regions() calling pcim_iomap_table()
is unproblematic?

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature