Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: sched: cls_api: add skip_sw counter

From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Date: Thu Feb 15 2024 - 18:39:48 EST


Hi Jamal,

Thank you for the review.

On 2/15/24 17:39, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
+Cc Vlad and Marcelo..

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:06 AM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Maintain a count of skip_sw filters.

This counter is protected by the cb_lock, and is updated
at the same time as offloadcnt.

Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/net/sch_generic.h | 1 +
net/sched/cls_api.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index 934fdb977551..46a63d1818a0 100644
--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
@@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ struct tcf_block {
struct flow_block flow_block;
struct list_head owner_list;
bool keep_dst;
+ atomic_t skipswcnt; /* Number of skip_sw filters */
atomic_t offloadcnt; /* Number of oddloaded filters */

For your use case is skipswcnt ever going to be any different than offloadcnt?

No, we only use skip_sw filters, since we only use TC as a control path to
install skip_sw rules into hardware.

AFAICT offloadcnt is the sum of skip_sw filters, and filters with no flags which
have implicitly been offloaded.

The reason that I didn't just use offloadcnt, is that I'm not sure if it is
acceptable to treat implicitly offloaded rules without skip_sw, as if they were
explicitly skip_sw. It sounds reasonable, given that the filters without skip_* flags
shouldn't really care.

I tried to only trigger the TC bypass, in the cases that I was absolutely sure would
be safe as a first step.



cheers,
jamal

unsigned int nooffloaddevcnt; /* Number of devs unable to do offload */
unsigned int lockeddevcnt; /* Number of devs that require rtnl lock. */
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index ca5676b2668e..397c3d29659c 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -3483,6 +3483,8 @@ static void tcf_block_offload_inc(struct tcf_block *block, u32 *flags)
if (*flags & TCA_CLS_FLAGS_IN_HW)
return;
*flags |= TCA_CLS_FLAGS_IN_HW;
+ if (tc_skip_sw(*flags))
+ atomic_inc(&block->skipswcnt);
atomic_inc(&block->offloadcnt);
}

@@ -3491,6 +3493,8 @@ static void tcf_block_offload_dec(struct tcf_block *block, u32 *flags)
if (!(*flags & TCA_CLS_FLAGS_IN_HW))
return;
*flags &= ~TCA_CLS_FLAGS_IN_HW;
+ if (tc_skip_sw(*flags))
+ atomic_dec(&block->skipswcnt);
atomic_dec(&block->offloadcnt);
}

--
2.43.0


--
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Network Engineer
Fiberby - AS42541