Re: [PATCH 02/31] ntsync: Introduce NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_SEM.
From: Elizabeth Figura
Date: Thu Feb 15 2024 - 14:22:16 EST
On Thursday, 15 February 2024 01:28:32 CST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:36:38PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> > This corresponds to the NT syscall NtCreateSemaphore().
> >
> > Semaphores are one of three types of object to be implemented in this driver,
> > the others being mutexes and events.
> >
> > An NT semaphore contains a 32-bit counter, and is signaled and can be acquired
> > when the counter is nonzero. The counter has a maximum value which is specified
> > at creation time. The initial value of the semaphore is also specified at
> > creation time. There are no restrictions on the maximum and initial value.
> >
> > Each object is exposed as an file, to which any number of fds may be opened.
> > When all fds are closed, the object is deleted.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst | 2 +
> > drivers/misc/ntsync.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h | 21 +++
> > 3 files changed, 143 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> > index 457e16f06e04..2f5c6994f042 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> > @@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments
> > 'M' 00-0F drivers/video/fsl-diu-fb.h conflict!
> > 'N' 00-1F drivers/usb/scanner.h
> > 'N' 40-7F drivers/block/nvme.c
> > +'N' 80-8F uapi/linux/ntsync.h NT synchronization primitives
> > + <mailto:wine-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 'O' 00-06 mtd/ubi-user.h UBI
> > 'P' all linux/soundcard.h conflict!
> > 'P' 60-6F sound/sscape_ioctl.h conflict!
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ntsync.c b/drivers/misc/ntsync.c
> > index e4969ef90722..3ad86d98b82d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ntsync.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ntsync.c
> > @@ -5,26 +5,146 @@
> > * Copyright (C) 2024 Elizabeth Figura
> > */
> >
> > +#include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
> > +#include <linux/file.h>
> > #include <linux/fs.h>
> > #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <uapi/linux/ntsync.h>
> >
> > #define NTSYNC_NAME "ntsync"
> >
> > +enum ntsync_type {
> > + NTSYNC_TYPE_SEM,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ntsync_obj {
> > + enum ntsync_type type;
> > +
> > + union {
> > + struct {
> > + __u32 count;
> > + __u32 max;
> > + } sem;
> > + } u;
> > +
> > + struct file *file;
> > + struct ntsync_device *dev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ntsync_device {
> > + struct file *file;
> > +};
>
> No reference counting is needed for your ntsync_device? Or are you
> relying on the reference counting of struct file here?
>
> You pass around pointers to this structure, and save it off into other
> structures, how do you know it is "safe" to do so?
Yes, this relies on the reference counting of struct file. The sync
objects (semaphore etc.) grab a reference when they're created, via
get_file(), and release it when they're destroyed. This reference is
taken from within ioctls on the ntsync_device, so the file must be
valid when we grab a reference. Maybe I'm missing something, though?