Re: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task.c: export sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Feb 15 2024 - 13:55:17 EST


On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 21:26:34 -0800 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 02:09:35AM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > needed for thread_with_file; also rare but not unheard of to need this
> > in module code, when blocking on user input.
> >
> > one workaround used by some code is wait_event_interruptible() - but
> > that can be buggy if the outer context isn't expecting unwinding.
>
> I don't think just exporting the variable ad thus allowing write
> access is a good idea. If we want to keep going down the route of
> this hack we should add an accessor function that returns the value.
>
> The cleaner solution would be a new task state that explicitly
> marks code than can sleep forever without triggerring the hang
> check. Although this might be a bit invaѕive and take a while.

A new PF_whatever flag would solve that simply?

Which are the potential use sites for such a thing?