Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add invalid filter test in pmu_event_filter_test

[Eric Auger]

Hi Shaoqin,

On 2/2/24 03:56, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
> Add the invalid filter test includes sets the filter beyond the event
s/includes/which
> space and sets the invalid action to double check if the
> KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER will return the expected error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c       | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> index d280382f362f..68e1f2003312 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>   * This test checks if the guest only see the limited pmu event that userspace
>   * sets, if the guest can use those events which user allow, and if the guest
>   * can't use those events which user deny.
> + * It also checks that setting invalid filter ranges return the expected error.
>   * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
>   * is supported on the host.
>   */
> @@ -183,6 +184,39 @@ static void for_each_test(void)
>  		run_test(t);
>  }
>  
> +static void set_invalid_filter(struct vpmu_vm *vm, void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter invalid;
> +	struct kvm_device_attr attr = {
> +		.group	= KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
> +		.attr	= KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER,
> +		.addr	= (uint64_t)&invalid,
> +	};
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* The max event number is (1 << 16), set a range largeer than it. */
in  practice it is 16b on ARMv8.1 and 10b on ARMv8.0 but obvioulsy the
check below works for both ;-)

larger typ
> +	invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(BIT(15), BIT(15)+1, 0);
space between "+"
> +	ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr);
kvm_device_attr_set() as commented by Oliver
> +	TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter range "
> +		    "ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
> +		    ret, errno);
> +
> +	ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* Set the Invalid action. */
> +	invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(0, 1, 3);
> +	ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter action "
> +		    "ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
> +		    ret, errno);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_invalid_filter(void)
> +{
> +	vpmu_vm = __create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, set_invalid_filter, NULL);
> +	destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm);
> +}
> +
>  static bool kvm_supports_pmu_event_filter(void)
>  {
>  	int r;
> @@ -216,4 +250,6 @@ int main(void)
>  	TEST_REQUIRE(host_pmu_supports_events());
>  
>  	for_each_test();
> +
> +	test_invalid_filter();
>  }
Thanks

Eric