Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] sbm: SandBox Mode documentation

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:55:24PM +0100, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> OK, so why didn't I send the whole thing?
> 
> Decomposition of the kernel requires many more changes, e.g. in linker
> scripts. Some of them depend on this patch series. Before I go and
> clean up my code into something that can be submitted, I want to get
> feedback from guys like you, to know if the whole idea would be even
> considered, aka "Fail Fast".

We can't honestly consider this portion without seeing how it would
work, as we don't even see a working implementation that uses it to
verify it at all.

The joy of adding new frameworks is that you need a user before anyone
can spend the time to review it, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h