Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] mm/page_owner: use order instead of nr in split_page_owner()

From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Wed Feb 14 2024 - 04:14:24 EST


On 13.02.24 22:55, Zi Yan wrote:
From: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>

We do not have non power of two pages, using nr is error prone if nr
is not power-of-two. Use page order instead.

Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/page_owner.h | 8 ++++----
mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
mm/page_owner.c | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/page_owner.h b/include/linux/page_owner.h
index 119a0c9d2a8b..d7878523adfc 100644
--- a/include/linux/page_owner.h
+++ b/include/linux/page_owner.h
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ extern struct page_ext_operations page_owner_ops;
extern void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order);
extern void __set_page_owner(struct page *page,
unsigned short order, gfp_t gfp_mask);
-extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr);
+extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order);
extern void __folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old);
extern void __set_page_owner_migrate_reason(struct page *page, int reason);
extern void __dump_page_owner(const struct page *page);
@@ -31,10 +31,10 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page,
__set_page_owner(page, order, gfp_mask);
}
-static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
+static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order)
{
if (static_branch_unlikely(&page_owner_inited))
- __split_page_owner(page, nr);
+ __split_page_owner(page, order);
}
static inline void folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old)
{
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page,
{
}
static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page,
- unsigned short order)
+ int order)

I assume this will fit into a single line now.



Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb