Re: [PATCH 6/6] fs: xfs: Set FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE for FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES set

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:26:43AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 02/02/2024 18:06, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 02:26:45PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > > For when an inode is enabled for atomic writes, set FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE
> > > flag.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 ++
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > index e33e5e13b95f..1375d0089806 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > @@ -1232,6 +1232,8 @@ xfs_file_open(
> > >   		return -EIO;
> > >   	file->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT | FMODE_BUF_RASYNC | FMODE_BUF_WASYNC |
> > >   			FMODE_DIO_PARALLEL_WRITE | FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
> > > +	if (xfs_inode_atomicwrites(XFS_I(inode)))
> 
> Note to self: This should also check if O_DIRECT is set
> 
> > 
> > Shouldn't we check that the device supports AWU at all before turning on
> > the FMODE flag?
> 
> Can we easily get this sort of bdev info here?
> 
> Currently if we do try to issue an atomic write and AWU for the bdev is
> zero, then XFS iomap code will reject it.

Hmm.  Well, if we move towards pushing all the hardware checks out of
xfs/iomap and into whatever goes on underneath submit_bio then I guess
we don't need to check device support here at all.

--D

> Thanks,
> John
> 
> > 
> > --D
> > 
> > > +		file->f_mode |= FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE;
> > >   	return generic_file_open(inode, file);
> > >   }
> > > -- 
> > > 2.31.1
> > > 
> > > 
> 
>