Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/cpu: fix invalid MTRR mask values for SEV or TME

[Dave Hansen]

On 2/1/24 15:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> There is unfortunately an important hurdle for your patch, in that
> currently the BSP and AP flows are completely different.

Do we even _need_ c->x86_phys_bits for APs?  I need to do a bit more
grepping, but I only see it being read in show_cpuinfo().  Everything
else seems to be boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits.