Re: [PATCH 01/14] writeback: don't call mapping_set_error in writepage_cb

From: Jan Kara
Date: Tue Feb 13 2024 - 08:07:47 EST


On Mon 12-02-24 08:13:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> writepage_cb is the iterator callback for write_cache_pages, which
> already tracks all errors and returns them to the caller. There is
> no need to additionally cal mapping_set_error which is intended
^^^ call

> for contexts where the error can't be directly returned (e.g. the
> I/O completion handlers).
>
> Remove the mapping_set_error call in writepage_cb which is not only
> superfluous but also buggy as it can be called with the error argument
> set to AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE, which is not actually an error but a
> magic return value asking the caller to unlock the page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Our error handling in writeback has always been ... spotty. E.g.
block_write_full_page() and iomap_writepage_map() call mapping_set_error()
as well so this seems to be a common way to do things, OTOH ext4 calls
mapping_set_error() only on IO completion. I guess the question is how
an error in ->writepages from background writeback should propagate to
eventual fsync(2) caller? Because currently such error propagates all the
way up to writeback_sb_inodes() where it is silently dropped...

Honza

> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 3f255534986a2f..62901fa905f01e 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -2534,9 +2534,8 @@ static int writepage_cb(struct folio *folio, struct writeback_control *wbc,
> void *data)
> {
> struct address_space *mapping = data;
> - int ret = mapping->a_ops->writepage(&folio->page, wbc);
> - mapping_set_error(mapping, ret);
> - return ret;
> +
> + return mapping->a_ops->writepage(&folio->page, wbc);
> }
>
> int do_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR