[PATCH v2 05/23] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Walk the LPI xarray in vgic_copy_lpi_list()

[Oliver Upton]

Start iterating the LPI xarray in anticipation of removing the LPI
linked-list.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 0265cd1f2d6e..aefe0794b71c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
 int vgic_copy_lpi_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 **intid_ptr)
 {
 	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
+	XA_STATE(xas, &dist->lpi_xa, GIC_LPI_OFFSET);
 	struct vgic_irq *irq;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 *intids;
@@ -354,7 +355,9 @@ int vgic_copy_lpi_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 **intid_ptr)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(irq, &dist->lpi_list_head, lpi_list) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
+	xas_for_each(&xas, irq, INTERRUPT_ID_BITS_ITS) {
 		if (i == irq_count)
 			break;
 		/* We don't need to "get" the IRQ, as we hold the list lock. */
@@ -362,6 +365,8 @@ int vgic_copy_lpi_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 **intid_ptr)
 			continue;
 		intids[i++] = irq->intid;
 	}
+
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
 
 	*intid_ptr = intids;
-- 
2.43.0.687.g38aa6559b0-goog