Re: [PATCH] Staging: nvec: nvec: fixed two usleep_range is preferred over udelay warnings

[Dan Carpenter]

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:36:45PM +0100, Moritz C. Weber wrote:
> Fixed a code style issue raised by checkpatch.

Needs Signed-off-by.  Please run your patches through checkpatch.

> ---
>  drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> index 2823cacde..18c5471d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
>  		break;
>  	case 2:		/* first byte after command */
>  		if (status == (I2C_SL_IRQ | RNW | RCVD)) {
> -			udelay(33);
> +			usleep_range(32, 33);

We only accept these udelay() -> usleep_range() patches if they have
been tested on real hardware.  Sorry.

regards,
dan carpenter