Re: [PATCH v16 2/6] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions

From: Vincent Donnefort
Date: Mon Feb 12 2024 - 05:46:09 EST

Next message: Kirill A. Shutemov: "[PATCHv7 01/16] x86/acpi: Extract ACPI MADT wakeup code into a separate file"
Previous message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH] ACPI: bus: make acpi_bus_type const"
In reply to: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v16 2/6] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions"
Next in thread: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v16 2/6] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[...]

> > +static void rb_update_meta_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> > +{
> > + struct trace_buffer_meta *meta = cpu_buffer->meta_page;
> > +
> > + meta->reader.read = cpu_buffer->reader_page->read;
> > + meta->reader.id = cpu_buffer->reader_page->id;
> > + meta->reader.lost_events = cpu_buffer->lost_events;
> > +
> > + meta->entries = local_read(&cpu_buffer->entries);
> > + meta->overrun = local_read(&cpu_buffer->overrun);
> > + meta->read = cpu_buffer->read;
> > +
> > + /* Some archs do not have data cache coherency between kernel and user-space */
> > + flush_dcache_folio(virt_to_folio(cpu_buffer->meta_page));
> > +}
> > +
> > static void
> > rb_reset_cpu(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> > {
> > @@ -5204,6 +5227,9 @@ rb_reset_cpu(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> > cpu_buffer->lost_events = 0;
> > cpu_buffer->last_overrun = 0;
> >
> > + if (READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->mapped))
>
> Isn't the buffer_mutex held when we modify mapped? I believe it's held
> here. I don't think we need a READ_ONCE() here. Is there a reason for it?
>
> Hmm, looking down, it looks like you take the buffer->mutex after
> setting mapped, is that necessary? If we take the buffer->mutex we can
> sync the reset with mapping.

The idea was to not take any of the buffer mutex, reader lock if the refcount is
simply inc/dec. Locks are only used if the meta-page is
installed/uninstalled.

The WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE is there only to make sure no compiler optimisation
could lead a reader to wrongly interpret that refcount while it is inc/dec. That
is probably not necessary and I'm happy to either drop it completely or replace
it by taking buffer mutex and reader lock whenever the refcount is inc/dec.

>
> > + rb_update_meta_page(cpu_buffer);
> > +
> > rb_head_page_activate(cpu_buffer);
> > cpu_buffer->pages_removed = 0;
> > }
> > @@ -5418,6 +5444,12 @@ int ring_buffer_swap_cpu(struct trace_buffer *buffer_a,
> > cpu_buffer_a = buffer_a->buffers[cpu];
> > cpu_buffer_b = buffer_b->buffers[cpu];
> >
> > + /* It's up to the callers to not try to swap mapped buffers */
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_buffer_a->mapped || cpu_buffer_b->mapped)) {
> > + ret = -EBUSY;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* At least make sure the two buffers are somewhat the same */
> > if (cpu_buffer_a->nr_pages != cpu_buffer_b->nr_pages)
> > goto out;
> > @@ -5682,7 +5714,8 @@ int ring_buffer_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
> > * Otherwise, we can simply swap the page with the one passed in.
> > */
> > if (read || (len < (commit - read)) ||
> > - cpu_buffer->reader_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page) {
> > + cpu_buffer->reader_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page ||
> > + READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->mapped)) {
>
> Here the buffer_mutex isn't held, but still, what's the purpose of the READ_ONCE?
>
> I wonder if we just grab the reader_lock when setting the mapped
> variable if that would be better than using READ/WRITE_ONCE, which I'm
> not sure is helpful.

ditto above.
>
>
> > struct buffer_data_page *rpage = cpu_buffer->reader_page->page;
> > unsigned int rpos = read;
> > unsigned int pos = 0;
> > @@ -5901,6 +5934,11 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
> >
> > cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
> >
> > + if (READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->mapped)) {
> > + err = -EBUSY;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Update the number of pages to match the new size */
> > nr_pages = old_size * buffer->buffers[cpu]->nr_pages;
> > nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages, buffer->subbuf_size);
> > @@ -6002,6 +6040,304 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set);
> >
> > +#define subbuf_page(off, start) \
> > + virt_to_page((void *)(start + (off << PAGE_SHIFT)))
> > +
> > +#define foreach_subbuf_page(sub_order, start, page) \
> > + page = subbuf_page(0, (start)); \
> > + for (int __off = 0; __off < (1 << (sub_order)); \
> > + __off++, page = subbuf_page(__off, (start)))
> > +
> > +static inline void subbuf_map_prepare(unsigned long subbuf_start, int order)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * When allocating order > 0 pages, only the first struct page has a
> > + * refcount > 1. Increasing the refcount here ensures none of the struct
> > + * page composing the sub-buffer is freeed when the mapping is closed.
> > + */
> > + foreach_subbuf_page(order, subbuf_start, page)
> > + page_ref_inc(page);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void subbuf_unmap(unsigned long subbuf_start, int order)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + foreach_subbuf_page(order, subbuf_start, page) {
> > + page_ref_dec(page);
> > + page->mapping = NULL;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rb_free_subbuf_ids(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> > +{
> > + int sub_id;
> > +
> > + for (sub_id = 0; sub_id < cpu_buffer->nr_pages + 1; sub_id++)
> > + subbuf_unmap(cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids[sub_id],
> > + cpu_buffer->buffer->subbuf_order);
> > +
> > + kfree(cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids);
> > + cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids = NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rb_alloc_meta_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> > +{
> > + if (cpu_buffer->meta_page)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + cpu_buffer->meta_page = page_to_virt(alloc_page(GFP_USER | __GFP_ZERO));
>
> The above is the main reason I'm looking for a v17. If that
> alloc_page() fails, what exactly is going to be returned here?
>
> #define page_to_virt(x) __va(PFN_PHYS(page_to_pfn(x)))
> #define __va(x) ((void *)((unsigned long)(x)+PAGE_OFFSET))
>
> I don't think that will be the result you expect. We need to do the
> alloc_page(), test the result of that, and then call page_to_virt() on a
> page that is not NULL.

Ouch, you're right!

>
> > + if (!cpu_buffer->meta_page)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rb_free_meta_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)cpu_buffer->meta_page;
> > +
>
> I'm thinking for extra safety we could add:
>
> if (!addr)
> return;
>
> So this function could be called twice without issue.

Ack.

>
> > + virt_to_page((void *)addr)->mapping = NULL;
> > + free_page(addr);
> > + cpu_buffer->meta_page = NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rb_setup_ids_meta_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
> > + unsigned long *subbuf_ids)
> > +{
> > + struct trace_buffer_meta *meta = cpu_buffer->meta_page;
> > + unsigned int nr_subbufs = cpu_buffer->nr_pages + 1;
> > + struct buffer_page *first_subbuf, *subbuf;
> > + int id = 0;
> > +
> > + subbuf_ids[id] = (unsigned long)cpu_buffer->reader_page->page;
> > + subbuf_map_prepare(subbuf_ids[id], cpu_buffer->buffer->subbuf_order);
> > + cpu_buffer->reader_page->id = id++;
> > +
> > + first_subbuf = subbuf = rb_set_head_page(cpu_buffer);
> > + do {
> > + if (id >= nr_subbufs) {
> > + WARN_ON(1);
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> if (WARN_ON(id >= nr_subbufs))
> break;
>
> > +
> > + subbuf_ids[id] = (unsigned long)subbuf->page;
> > + subbuf->id = id;
> > + subbuf_map_prepare(subbuf_ids[id], cpu_buffer->buffer->subbuf_order);
> > +
> > + rb_inc_page(&subbuf);
> > + id++;
> > + } while (subbuf != first_subbuf);
> > +
> > + /* install subbuf ID to kern VA translation */
> > + cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids = subbuf_ids;
> > +
> > + meta->meta_page_size = PAGE_SIZE;
> > + meta->meta_struct_len = sizeof(*meta);
> > + meta->nr_subbufs = nr_subbufs;
> > + meta->subbuf_size = cpu_buffer->buffer->subbuf_size + BUF_PAGE_HDR_SIZE;
> > +
> > + rb_update_meta_page(cpu_buffer);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *
> > +rb_get_mapped_buffer(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
> > +
> > + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +
> > + cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
> > +
> > + if (!cpu_buffer->mapped) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return cpu_buffer;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void rb_put_mapped_buffer(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> > +{
> > + mutex_unlock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int ring_buffer_map(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
> > + unsigned long flags, *subbuf_ids;
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
>
> Is there a reason not to take the buffer->mutex before setting mapped?
>
> > +
> > + if (cpu_buffer->mapped) {
> > + if (cpu_buffer->mapped == UINT_MAX)
> > + err = -EBUSY;
> > + else
> > + WRITE_ONCE(cpu_buffer->mapped, cpu_buffer->mapped + 1);
>
> As mentioned before, it may be better to take the reader_lock when
> setting mapped and that should add the protection we want with mapped
> set and other readers.
>
> > + mutex_unlock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* prevent another thread from changing buffer/sub-buffer sizes */
> > + mutex_lock(&buffer->mutex);
> > +
> > + err = rb_alloc_meta_page(cpu_buffer);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto unlock;
> > +
> > + /* subbuf_ids include the reader while nr_pages does not */
> > + subbuf_ids = kzalloc(sizeof(*subbuf_ids) * (cpu_buffer->nr_pages + 1),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Instead use:
>
> subbuf_ids = kcalloc(cpu_buffer->nr_pages + 1, sizeof(*subbuf_ids), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> > + if (!subbuf_ids) {
> > + rb_free_meta_page(cpu_buffer);
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Lock all readers to block any subbuf swap until the subbuf IDs are
> > + * assigned.
> > + */
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + rb_setup_ids_meta_page(cpu_buffer, subbuf_ids);
> > + cpu_buffer->mapped = 1;
> > +
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> > +unlock:
> > + mutex_unlock(&buffer->mutex);
> > + mutex_unlock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int ring_buffer_unmap(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
> > +
> > + if (!cpu_buffer->mapped) {
> > + err = -ENODEV;
> > + goto out;
> > + } else if (cpu_buffer->mapped > 1) {
> > + WRITE_ONCE(cpu_buffer->mapped, cpu_buffer->mapped - 1);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&buffer->mutex);
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + cpu_buffer->mapped = 0;
> > +
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + rb_free_subbuf_ids(cpu_buffer);
> > + rb_free_meta_page(cpu_buffer);
> > + atomic_dec(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled);
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&buffer->mutex);
> > +out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * +--------------+ pgoff == 0
> > + * | meta page |
> > + * +--------------+ pgoff == 1
> > + * | subbuffer 0 |
> > + * +--------------+ pgoff == 1 + (1 << subbuf_order)
> > + * | subbuffer 1 |
> > + * ...
> > + */
> > +struct page *ring_buffer_map_fault(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
> > + unsigned long pgoff)
> > +{
> > + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
> > + unsigned long subbuf_id, subbuf_offset, addr;
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + if (!pgoff)
> > + return virt_to_page((void *)cpu_buffer->meta_page);
> > +
> > + pgoff--;
> > +
> > + subbuf_id = pgoff >> buffer->subbuf_order;
> > + if (subbuf_id > cpu_buffer->nr_pages)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + subbuf_offset = pgoff & ((1UL << buffer->subbuf_order) - 1);
> > + addr = cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids[subbuf_id] + (subbuf_offset * PAGE_SIZE);
> > + page = virt_to_page((void *)addr);
> > +
> > + return page;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int ring_buffer_map_get_reader(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
> > + unsigned long reader_size;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + cpu_buffer = rb_get_mapped_buffer(buffer, cpu);
> > + if (IS_ERR(cpu_buffer))
> > + return (int)PTR_ERR(cpu_buffer);
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> > +consume:
> > + if (rb_per_cpu_empty(cpu_buffer))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + reader_size = rb_page_size(cpu_buffer->reader_page);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * There are data to be read on the current reader page, we can
> > + * return to the caller. But before that, we assume the latter will read
> > + * everything. Let's update the kernel reader accordingly.
> > + */
> > + if (cpu_buffer->reader_page->read < reader_size) {
> > + while (cpu_buffer->reader_page->read < reader_size)
> > + rb_advance_reader(cpu_buffer);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON(!rb_get_reader_page(cpu_buffer)))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + goto consume;
> > +out:
> > + rb_update_meta_page(cpu_buffer);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> > + rb_put_mapped_buffer(cpu_buffer);
> > +
>
> Hmm, there's no protection here. If this task gets preempted for a long
> time, it is possible that the cpu_buffer->reader_page can become NULL,
> causing a NULL kernel dereference.

Right, this should be behind the reader lock as well :-\

>
> -- Steve
>
>
> > + /* Some archs do not have data cache coherency between kernel and user-space */
> > + flush_dcache_folio(virt_to_folio(cpu_buffer->reader_page->page));
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * We only allocate new buffers, never free them if the CPU goes down.
> > * If we were to free the buffer, then the user would lose any trace that was in
>

Next message: Kirill A. Shutemov: "[PATCHv7 01/16] x86/acpi: Extract ACPI MADT wakeup code into a separate file"
Previous message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH] ACPI: bus: make acpi_bus_type const"
In reply to: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v16 2/6] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions"
Next in thread: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v16 2/6] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]