Re: [PATCH] gpio: uapi: clarify default_values being logical

[Kent Gibson]

On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 06:58:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 12:14 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The documentation for default_values mentions high/low which can be
> > confusing, particularly when the ACTIVE_LOW flag is set.
> >
> > Replace high/low with active/inactive to clarify that the values are
> > logical not physical.
> >
> > Similarly, clarify the interpretation of values in struct gpiohandle_data.
>
> I'm not against this particular change, but I want the entire GPIO
> documentation to be aligned in the terminology aspect. Is this the
> case after this patch? I.o.w. have we replaced all leftovers?
>

Agreed. Those are the last remnants of the low/high terminolgy that I am
aware of, certainly the last in gpio.h.

Having a closer look to double check...

Ah - it is still used in Documentation/userspace-api/gpio/sysfs.rst -
not somewhere I go very often.
Would you like that updated in a separate patch?

Cheers,
Kent.