Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/IOV: Revert "PCI/IOV: Serialize sysfs sriov_numvfs reads vs writes"

From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Date: Sun Feb 11 2024 - 14:15:55 EST



On 2/11/24 12:48 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 07:20:28PM -0800, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> On 2/9/24 3:52 PM, Jim Harris wrote:
>>> If an SR-IOV enabled device is held by vfio, and the device is removed,
>>> vfio will hold device lock and notify userspace of the removal. If
>>> userspace reads the sriov_numvfs sysfs entry, that thread will be blocked
>>> since sriov_numvfs_show() also tries to acquire the device lock. If that
>>> same thread is responsible for releasing the device to vfio, it results in
>>> a deadlock.
>>>
>>> The proper way to detect a change to the num_VFs value is to listen for a
>>> sysfs event, not to add a device_lock() on the attribute _show() in the
>>> kernel.
>> Since you are reverting a commit that synchronizes SysFS read
>> /write, please add some comments about why it is not an
>> issue anymore.
> It was never an issue, the idea that sysfs read and write should be serialized by kernel
> is not correct by definition.

What:           /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../sriov_numvfs
Date:           November 2012
Contact:        Donald Dutile <ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx>
Description:
                This file appears when a physical PCIe device supports SR-IOV.
                Userspace applications can read and write to this file to
                determine and control the enablement or disablement of Virtual
                Functions (VFs) on the physical function (PF). A read of this
                file will return the number of VFs that are enabled on this PF.

I am not very clear about the user of this SysFs. But, as per above description,
this sysfs seems to controls the number of VFs. A typical usage is to allow user
to write a value and then read to check the enabled/disabled number of VMs,
right?

If you are not synchronizing, then the value returned may not reflect the actual
number of enabled / disabled VFs. So wont this change affect the existing user
of this SysFS.

>
> Thanks
>
>>> This reverts commit 35ff867b76576e32f34c698ccd11343f7d616204.
>>> Revert had a small conflict, the sprintf() is now changed to sysfs_emit().
>>>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/ZXJI5+f8bUelVXqu@ubuntu/
>>> Suggested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <jim.harris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/iov.c | 8 +-------
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>>> index aaa33e8dc4c9..0ca20cd518d5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>>> @@ -395,14 +395,8 @@ static ssize_t sriov_numvfs_show(struct device *dev,
>>> char *buf)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>>> - u16 num_vfs;
>>> -
>>> - /* Serialize vs sriov_numvfs_store() so readers see valid num_VFs */
>>> - device_lock(&pdev->dev);
>>> - num_vfs = pdev->sriov->num_VFs;
>>> - device_unlock(&pdev->dev);
>>>
>>> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", num_vfs);
>>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", pdev->sriov->num_VFs);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>>
>> --
>> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
>> Linux Kernel Developer
>>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer