Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] sched/fair: Rework sched_use_asym_prio() and sched_asym_prefer()

From: kuiliang Shi
Date: Fri Feb 09 2024 - 06:09:07 EST




On 2/9/24 10:47 AM, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:47:03AM +0800, alexs@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> sched_use_asym_prio() sched_asym_prefer() are used together in various
>
> s/prio() sched/prio() and sched/

Will take it, Thanks!

>
>> places. Consolidate them into a single function sched_asym().
>>
>> The existing sched_group_asym() is only used when collecting statistics
>> of a scheduling group. Rename it as sched_group_asym().
>> This makes the code easier to read. No functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index 607dc310b355..942b6358f683 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -9746,8 +9746,18 @@ static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
>> return sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY || is_core_idle(cpu);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool sched_asym(struct sched_domain *sd, int dst_cpu, int src_cpu)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * First check if @dst_cpu can do asym_packing load balance. Only do it
>> + * if it has higher priority than @src_cpu.
>> + */
>> + return sched_use_asym_prio(sd, dst_cpu) &&
>> + sched_asym_prefer(dst_cpu, src_cpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> - * sched_asym - Check if the destination CPU can do asym_packing load balance
>> + * sched_group_asym - Check if the destination CPU can do asym_packing balance
>> * @env: The load balancing environment
>> * @sgs: Load-balancing statistics of the candidate busiest group
>> * @group: The candidate busiest group
>
> After renaming and changing this function now its documentation has become
> obsolete. Can you update it?

Since the function sched_use_asym_prio() and sched_asym_prefer() both give detailed comments for their actions, as long as this function does, could we just remove the bit obsolete comments here?


@@ -9765,14 +9765,6 @@ static inline bool sched_asym(struct sched_domain *sd, int dst_cpu, int src_cpu)
* @env::dst_cpu can do asym_packing if it has higher priority than the
* preferred CPU of @group.
*
- * SMT is a special case. If we are balancing load between cores, @env::dst_cpu
- * can do asym_packing balance only if all its SMT siblings are idle. Also, it
- * can only do it if @group is an SMT group and has exactly on busy CPU. Larger
- * imbalances in the number of CPUS are dealt with in find_busiest_group().
- *
- * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at PKG domain level, always
- * proceed.
- *
* Return: true if @env::dst_cpu can do with asym_packing load balance. False
* otherwise.
>