Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: pci: layerscape-pci: Convert to yaml file

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Thu Feb 08 2024 - 14:13:58 EST


On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 12:49:19PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 05:17:55PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Hey Frank,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 01:24:02AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > Convert layerscape pcie bind document to yaml file.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/pci/fsl,layerscape-pcie-ep.yaml | 84 +++++++++
> > > .../bindings/pci/fsl,layerscape-pcie.yaml | 163 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > .../bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt | 79 ---------
> > > 3 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,layerscape-pcie-ep.yaml
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,layerscape-pcie.yaml
> > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,layerscape-pcie-ep.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,layerscape-pcie-ep.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000000..3b592c820eb4c
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,layerscape-pcie-ep.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/fsl,layerscape-pcie-ep.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Freescale Layerscape PCIe controller
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > + - Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > > +
> > > +description: |+
> >
> > Are you sure that you need this chomping operator?
> >
> > > + This PCIe endpoint controller is based on the Synopsys DesignWare PCIe IP
> >
> > > + and thus inherits all the common properties defined in snps,dw-pcie-ep.yaml.
> >
> > You shouldn't need this statement given you have the ref: below.
> >
> > > +
> > > + This controller derives its clocks from the Reset Configuration Word (RCW)
> > > + which is used to describe the PLL settings at the time of chip-reset.
> > > +
> > > + Also as per the available Reference Manuals, there is no specific 'version'
> > > + register available in the Freescale PCIe controller register set,
> > > + which can allow determining the underlying DesignWare PCIe controller version
> > > + information.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + enum:
> > > + - fsl,ls2088a-pcie-ep
> > > + - fsl,ls1088a-pcie-ep
> > > + - fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep
> > > + - fsl,ls1028a-pcie-ep
> > > + - fsl,lx2160ar2-pcie-ep
> >
> > Where did the fallback compatible go?
>
> So far, no fallback compatible needed now. each devices already have its
> compatible string.

It used to exist though, have you checked that u-boot or *bsd etc do not
use the fallback compatible? You also need to mention your justification
for removing it in the commit message.

> > > +
> > > + reg:
> > > + maxItems: 2
> > > +
> > > + reg-names:
> > > + items:
> > > + - const: regs
> > > + - const: addr_space
> >
> > The example uses "regs" and "config". Where did addr_space come from?
>
> Example just show pcie-host part. Not show pcie-ep part.
> pcie-ep part need 'addr_space'.

Okay. Again, please mention where this is coming from.

>
> >
> > > + fsl,pcie-scfg:
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > > + description: A phandle to the SCFG device node. The second entry is the
> > > + physical PCIe controller index starting from '0'. This is used to get
> > > + SCFG PEXN registers.
> > > +
> > > + dma-coherent:
> >
> > dma-coherent: true
> >
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> > > + description: Indicates that the hardware IP block can ensure the coherency
> > > + of the data transferred from/to the IP block. This can avoid the software
> > > + cache flush/invalid actions, and improve the performance significantly.
> > > +
> > > + big-endian:
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> > > + description: If the PEX_LUT and PF register block is in big-endian, specify
> > > + this property.
> > > +
> > > +required:
> > > + - compatible
> > > + - reg
> > > + - reg-names
> >
> > This was not previously required, why is it required now?
>
> Actually its needed.

Well, if it wasn't, I'd hope that you wouldn't be making it required.
But I asked /why/ and you've not given a reason. Please mention the why
in your commit message for v2.

Cheers,
Conor.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature