Re: [PATCH 4/7] cpuidle: s/CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING/CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING_SOFT

[Frederic Weisbecker]

Le Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 02:09:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:32 PM Frederic Weisbecker
> <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > In order to further distinguish software and hardware TIF_NEED_RESCHED
> > polling cpuidle states, rename CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING to
> > CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING_SOFT before introducing CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING_HARD
> > and tag mwait users with it.
> 
> Well, if MWAIT users are the only category that will be tagged with
> the new flag, it can be called CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING_MWAIT or even
> CPUIDLE_FLAG_MWAIT for that matter and the $subject patch won't be
> necessary any more AFAICS.

Yep.

> 
> > This will allow cpuidle core to manage TIF_NR_POLLING on behalf of all
> > kinds of TIF_NEED_RESCHED polling states while keeping a necessary
> > distinction for the governors between software loops polling on
> > TIF_NEED_RESCHED and hardware monitored writes to thread flags.
> 
> Fair enough, but what about using a different name for the new flag
> and leaving the old one as is?

Sounds good. Will do.

Thanks!