Re: [PATCH v18 048/121] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Don't zap private pages for unsupported cases

From: Binbin Wu
Date: Tue Jan 30 2024 - 01:09:31 EST




On 1/23/2024 7:53 AM, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>

TDX supports only write-back(WB) memory type for private memory
architecturally so that (virtualized) memory type change doesn't make sense
for private memory. Also currently, page migration isn't supported for TDX
yet. (TDX architecturally supports page migration. it's KVM and kernel
implementation issue.)

Regarding memory type change (mtrr virtualization and lapic page mapping
change), pages are zapped by kvm_zap_gfn_range(). On the next KVM page
fault, the SPTE entry with a new memory type for the page is populated.
Regarding page migration, pages are zapped by the mmu notifier. On the next
KVM page fault, the new migrated page is populated. Don't zap private
pages on unmapping for those two cases.

When deleting/moving a KVM memory slot, zap private pages. Typically
tearing down VM. Don't invalidate private page tables. i.e. zap only leaf
SPTEs for KVM mmu that has a shared bit mask. The existing
kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots() depends on role.invalid with read-lock
of mmu_lock so that other vcpu can operate on KVM mmu concurrently. It
marks the root page table invalid and zaps SPTEs of the root page
tables. The TDX module doesn't allow to unlink a protected root page table
from the hardware and then allocate a new one for it. i.e. replacing a
protected root page table. Instead, zap only leaf SPTEs for KVM mmu with a
shared bit mask set.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h | 5 ++--
3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 32c619125be4..f4fbf42e05fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -6267,7 +6267,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
* e.g. before kvm_zap_obsolete_pages() could drop mmu_lock and yield.
*/
if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
- kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(kvm);
+ kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(kvm, true);
/*
* Notify all vcpus to reload its shadow page table and flush TLB.
@@ -6389,7 +6389,16 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
flush = kvm_rmap_zap_gfn_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
- flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end, flush);
+ /*
+ * zap_private = false. Zap only shared pages.
+ *
+ * kvm_zap_gfn_range() is used when MTRR or PAT memory
+ * type was changed. Later on the next kvm page fault,
+ * populate it with updated spte entry.
+ * Because only WB is supported for private pages, don't
+ * care of private pages.
+ */
+ flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end, flush, false);
if (flush)
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end - gfn_start);
@@ -6835,10 +6844,56 @@ void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_mmu_zap_all(kvm);
}
+static void kvm_mmu_zap_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
+{
+ bool flush = false;
+
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Zapping non-leaf SPTEs, a.k.a. not-last SPTEs, isn't required, worst
+ * case scenario we'll have unused shadow pages lying around until they
+ * are recycled due to age or when the VM is destroyed.
+ */
+ if (tdp_mmu_enabled) {
+ struct kvm_gfn_range range = {
+ .slot = slot,
+ .start = slot->base_gfn,
+ .end = slot->base_gfn + slot->npages,
+ .may_block = true,
+
+ /*
+ * This handles both private gfn and shared gfn.
+ * All private page should be zapped on memslot deletion.
+ */
+ .only_private = true,
+ .only_shared = true,
only_{private,shared} were added in Sean's gmem patch series, but removed
in v14.
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20231105163040.14904-1-pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx/
I didn't find the two members are added in this patch series, is there other
dependent patches?

Also, what does it mean by setting both only_private and only_shared as true?
Per your comment, it seems both shared & private should be handled.
Then, they both should be false?

It is a bit confusing, maybe you can consider to use enum mentioned in the
discussion below?
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/ZUO1Giju0GkUdF0o@xxxxxxxxxx/#t


+ };
+
+ flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, &range, flush);
+ } else {
+ /* TDX supports only TDP-MMU case. */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ flush = true;
+ }
+ if (flush)
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+}
+
void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
{
- kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);
+ if (kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm))
+ /*
+ * Secure-EPT requires to release PTs from the leaf. The
+ * optimization to zap root PT first with child PT doesn't
+ * work.
+ */
+ kvm_mmu_zap_memslot(kvm, slot);
+ else
+ kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);
}
void kvm_mmu_invalidate_mmio_sptes(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gen)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index d47f0daf1b03..e7514a807134 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
* for zapping and thus puts the TDP MMU's reference to each root, i.e.
* ultimately frees all roots.
*/
- kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(kvm);
+ kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(kvm, false);
kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(kvm);
WARN_ON(atomic64_read(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages));
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
* operation can cause a soft lockup.
*/
static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
- gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush)
+ gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush,
+ bool zap_private)
{
struct tdp_iter iter;
@@ -779,6 +780,10 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(zap_private && !is_private_sp(root));
+ if (!zap_private && is_private_sp(root))
+ return false;
+
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_tdp_pte_min_level(iter, root, PG_LEVEL_4K, start, end) {
@@ -810,13 +815,15 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
* true if a TLB flush is needed before releasing the MMU lock, i.e. if one or
* more SPTEs were zapped since the MMU lock was last acquired.
*/
-bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool flush)
+bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool flush,
+ bool zap_private)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root)
- flush = tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(kvm, root, start, end, true, flush);
+ flush = tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(kvm, root, start, end, true, flush,
+ zap_private && is_private_sp(root));
return flush;
}
@@ -891,7 +898,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(struct kvm *kvm)
* Note, kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots() is gifted the TDP MMU's reference.
* See kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa().
*/
-void kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(struct kvm *kvm)
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(struct kvm *kvm, bool skip_private)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
@@ -916,6 +923,12 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(struct kvm *kvm)
* or get/put references to roots.
*/
list_for_each_entry(root, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link) {
+ /*
+ * Skip private root since private page table
+ * is only torn down when VM is destroyed.
+ */
+ if (skip_private && is_private_sp(root))
+ continue;
/*
* Note, invalid roots can outlive a memslot update! Invalid
* roots must be *zapped* before the memslot update completes,
@@ -1104,14 +1117,26 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
return ret;
}
+/* Used by mmu notifier via kvm_unmap_gfn_range() */
bool kvm_tdp_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
bool flush)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
+ bool zap_private = false;
+
+ if (kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm)) {
+ if (!range->only_private && !range->only_shared)
+ /* attributes change */
+ zap_private = !(range->arg.attributes &
+ KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE);
+ else
+ zap_private = range->only_private;
+ }
__for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id, false)
flush = tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(kvm, root, range->start, range->end,
- range->may_block, flush);
+ range->may_block, flush,
+ zap_private && is_private_sp(root));
return flush;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
index 20d97aa46c49..b3cf58a50357 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
@@ -19,10 +19,11 @@ __must_check static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root);
-bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool flush);
+bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool flush,
+ bool zap_private);
bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm);
-void kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(struct kvm *kvm);
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(struct kvm *kvm, bool skip_private);
void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(struct kvm *kvm);
int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault);