Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm/hash: Code cleanup

From: Kunwu Chan
Date: Thu Jan 25 2024 - 20:51:49 EST


On 2024/1/25 21:47, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 1/25/24 3:16 PM, Kunwu Chan wrote:
This part was commented in about 17 years before.
If there are no plans to enable this part code in the future,
we can remove this dead code.

Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h | 22 -------------------
1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h
index 1c4eebbc69c9..d39ec7134a78 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h
@@ -731,26 +731,6 @@ struct hash_mm_context {
#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_SUBPAGE_PROT */
};
-#if 0
-/*
- * The code below is equivalent to this function for arguments
- * < 2^VSID_BITS, which is all this should ever be called
- * with. However gcc is not clever enough to compute the
- * modulus (2^n-1) without a second multiply.
- */
-#define vsid_scramble(protovsid, size) \
- ((((protovsid) * VSID_MULTIPLIER_##size) % VSID_MODULUS_##size))
-
-/* simplified form avoiding mod operation */
-#define vsid_scramble(protovsid, size) \
- ({ \
- unsigned long x; \
- x = (protovsid) * VSID_MULTIPLIER_##size; \
- x = (x >> VSID_BITS_##size) + (x & VSID_MODULUS_##size); \
- (x + ((x+1) >> VSID_BITS_##size)) & VSID_MODULUS_##size; \
- })
-
-#else /* 1 */
static inline unsigned long vsid_scramble(unsigned long protovsid,
unsigned long vsid_multiplier, int vsid_bits)
{
@@ -764,8 +744,6 @@ static inline unsigned long vsid_scramble(unsigned long protovsid,
return (vsid + ((vsid + 1) >> vsid_bits)) & vsid_modulus;
}
-#endif /* 1 */
-
/* Returns the segment size indicator for a user address */
static inline int user_segment_size(unsigned long addr)
{

That was done to make sure one can follow the actual compiled code better.
Thanks for your explanation. It's my bad.

-aneesh

--
Thanks,
Kunwu