RE: [PATCH v4 2/4] mailbox: imx: support return value of init

From: Peng Fan
Date: Thu Jan 25 2024 - 06:07:57 EST


> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mailbox: imx: support return value of init
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2024, 06:20:04 CET schrieb Peng Fan (OSS):
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > There will be changes that init may fail, so adding return value for
> > init function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 35
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c index 656171362fe9..dced4614065f
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ struct imx_mu_dcfg {
> > int (*tx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void
> > *data); int (*rx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp);
> > int (*rxdb)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp); -
> void
> > (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
> > + int (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
> > enum imx_mu_type type;
> > u32 xTR; /* Transmit Register0 */
> > u32 xRR; /* Receive Register0 */
> > @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ static struct mbox_chan
> *imx_mu_seco_xlate(struct
> > mbox_controller *mbox, return imx_mu_xlate(mbox, sp); }
> >
> > -static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
> > +static int imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
> > {
> > unsigned int i;
> > unsigned int val;
> > @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct
> imx_mu_priv
> > *priv) priv->mbox.of_xlate = imx_mu_xlate;
> >
> > if (priv->side_b)
> > - return;
> > + return 0;
> >
> > /* Set default MU configuration */
> > for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_xCR_MAX; i++) @@ -770,9 +770,11 @@ static
> > void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv
> > *priv) /* Clear any pending RSR */
> > for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_NUM_RR; i++)
> > imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void imx_mu_init_specific(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
> > +static int imx_mu_init_specific(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
> > {
> > unsigned int i;
> > int num_chans = priv->dcfg->type & IMX_MU_V2_S4 ?
> IMX_MU_S4_CHANS :
> > IMX_MU_SCU_CHANS; @@ -794,12 +796,20 @@ static void
> > imx_mu_init_specific(struct imx_mu_priv *priv) /* Set default MU
> > configuration */
> > for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_xCR_MAX; i++)
> > imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR[i]);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void imx_mu_init_seco(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
> > +static int imx_mu_init_seco(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
> > {
> > - imx_mu_init_generic(priv);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = imx_mu_init_generic(priv);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > priv->mbox.of_xlate = imx_mu_seco_xlate;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) @@ -866,7
> > +876,11 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > priv->side_b = of_property_read_bool(np, "fsl,mu-side-b");
> >
> > - priv->dcfg->init(priv);
> > + ret = priv->dcfg->init(priv);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to init MU\n");
>
> As this is during probe, I rather use dev_err_probe right away. Even if dcfg-
> >init won't return -EPROBE_DEFER for now.

Let's defer this action until init could return -EPROBE_DEFER.

Thanks,
Peng.

>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
> > + goto disable_clk;
> > + }
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&priv->xcr_lock);
> >
> > @@ -878,10 +892,8 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> >
> > ret = devm_mbox_controller_register(dev, &priv->mbox);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto disable_clk;
> >
> > pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> >
> > @@ -899,6 +911,7 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > disable_runtime_pm:
> > pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> > +disable_clk:
> > clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> > return ret;
> > }
>
>
> --
> TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
> Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
> Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
> http://www.t/
> q-
> group.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C77ae5cd17000
> 42c9a4f008dc1d85b1ba%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7
> C0%7C638417707259707963%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4
> wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7
> C%7C%7C&sdata=OuTmDvQM0MYTBv%2BhwtQNPgd%2BuA9cMKoBIHe%2Fi
> Zl9Iu4%3D&reserved=0
>