Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Disconnect devices before rfkilling adapter

From: Jonas Dreßler
Date: Wed Jan 24 2024 - 13:05:38 EST


Hi Luiz,

On 1/8/24 11:25 PM, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
Hi Luiz,

On 1/8/24 19:05, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
Hi Jonas,

On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 1:03 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Apparently the firmware is supposed to power off the bluetooth card
properly, including disconnecting devices, when we use rfkill to block
bluetooth. This doesn't work on a lot of laptops though, leading to weird
issues after turning off bluetooth, like the connection timing out on the
peripherals which were connected, and bluetooth not connecting properly
when the adapter is turned on again after rfkilling.

This series uses the rfkill hook in the bluetooth subsystem
to execute a few more shutdown commands and make sure that all
devices get disconnected before we close the HCI connection to the adapter.

---

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20240102133311.6712-1-verdre@xxxxxxx/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20240102181946.57288-1-verdre@xxxxxxx/
v3:
  - Update commit message titles to reflect what's actually happening
    (disconnecting devices, not sending a power-off command).
  - Doing the shutdown sequence synchronously instead of async now.
  - Move HCI_RFKILLED flag back again to be set before shutdown.
  - Added a "fallback" hci_dev_do_close() to the error path because
    hci_set_powered_sync() might bail-out early on error.

Jonas Dreßler (4):
   Bluetooth: Remove HCI_POWER_OFF_TIMEOUT
   Bluetooth: mgmt: Remove leftover queuing of power_off work
   Bluetooth: Add new state HCI_POWERING_DOWN
   Bluetooth: Disconnect connected devices before rfkilling adapter

  include/net/bluetooth/hci.h |  2 +-
  net/bluetooth/hci_core.c    | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c    | 16 +++++++++++-----
  net/bluetooth/mgmt.c        | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
  4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

--
2.43.0

I will probably be applying this sortly, but let's try to add tests to
mgmt-tester just to make sure we don't introduce regressions later,
btw it seems there are a few suspend test that do connect, for
example:

Suspend - Success 5 (Pairing - Legacy) - waiting 1 seconds
random: crng init done
   New connection with handle 0x002a
   Test condition complete, 1 left
Suspend - Success 5 (Pairing - Legacy) - waiting done
   Set the system into Suspend via force_suspend
   New Controller Suspend event received
   Test condition complete, 0 left


Thanks for that hint, I've been starting to write a test and managed to
write to the rfkill file and it's blocking the device just fine, except
I've run into what might be a bug in the virtual HCI driver:

So the power down sequence is initiated on the rfkill as expected and
hci_set_powered_sync(false) is called. That then calls
hci_write_scan_enable_sync(), and this HCI command never gets a response
from the virtual HCI driver. Strangely, BT_HCI_CMD_WRITE_SCAN_ENABLE is
implemented in btdev.c and the callback does get executed (I checked), it
just doesn't send the command completed event:

< HCI Command: Write Scan Enable (0x03|0x001a) plen 1                                                                                                                                       #1588 [hci1] 12.294234
        Scan enable: No Scans (0x00)

no response after...


So I think I found the problem here too:

The problem with this one is that calling hci_set_powered_sync() from
within the context of the write to the rfkill device blocks the write()
until the HCI commands have returned. Because the mgmt-tester process is
stuck in write(), it can't reply to the HCI commands using the emulator
(which runs in the same thread), and after two seconds the HCI command
times out and the test ends.

I haven't really been able to confirm this other than that we're indeed
blocked in write(), does this sound like a sane explanation to you?

Seems like for this to work we'd either have to stop blocking userspace
until the rfkill has finished/failed (don't think that's a good idea), or
write to the rfkill device from an separate thread in mgmt-tester? The
latter should be fairly easy, so I'll give that a shot.

Cheers,
Jonas