Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: update log level messages

From: Miquel Raynal
Date: Wed Jan 24 2024 - 12:37:31 EST


Hi David,

dregan@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 23 Jan 2024 19:04:57 -0800:

> Update log level messages so that more critical messages
> can be seen.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Regan <dregan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v3: None
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Added to patch series
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> index 6b5d76eff0ec..a4e311b6798c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static int bcmnand_ctrl_poll_status(struct brcmnand_host *host,
> if ((val & mask) == expected_val)
> return 0;
>
> - dev_warn(ctrl->dev, "timeout on status poll (expected %x got %x)\n",
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "timeout on status poll (expected %x got %x)\n",

I don't see the point but if you want.

> expected_val, val & mask);
>
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> @@ -2196,7 +2196,7 @@ static int brcmnand_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> return err;
> }
>
> - dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "uncorrectable error at 0x%llx\n",
> + dev_err(ctrl->dev, "uncorrectable error at 0x%llx\n",

Upper layer will complain, you can keep this at the debug level.

> (unsigned long long)err_addr);
> mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> /* NAND layer expects zero on ECC errors */
> @@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ static int brcmnand_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> err = brcmnand_read_by_pio(mtd, chip, addr, trans, buf,
> oob, &err_addr);
>
> - dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "corrected error at 0x%llx\n",
> + dev_info(ctrl->dev, "corrected error at 0x%llx\n",

Definitely not! Way too verbose. Please keep this one as it is.

> (unsigned long long)err_addr);
> mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += corrected;
> /* Always exceed the software-imposed threshold */


Thanks,
Miquèl