Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] ntsync: Reserve a minor device number and ioctl range.

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Jan 23 2024 - 19:54:13 EST


On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:40:21PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Note, we can't take patches without any changelog text, and you don't
want us to :)

> Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt | 3 ++-
> Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst | 2 ++
> drivers/misc/ntsync.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/miscdevice.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt
> index 94c98be1329a..041404397ee5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt
> @@ -376,8 +376,9 @@
> 240 = /dev/userio Serio driver testing device
> 241 = /dev/vhost-vsock Host kernel driver for virtio vsock
> 242 = /dev/rfkill Turning off radio transmissions (rfkill)
> + 243 = /dev/ntsync NT synchronization primitive device
>
> - 243-254 Reserved for local use
> + 244-254 Reserved for local use

Why do you need a fixed minor number? Can't your userspace handle
dynamic numbers? What systems require a static value?

thanks,

greg k-h