Re: [PATCH v3] perf evlist: Fix evlist__new_default() for > 1 core PMU

From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Tue Jan 23 2024 - 19:47:03 EST


Hi James,

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 2:39 AM James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The 'Session topology' test currently fails with this message when
> evlist__new_default() opens more than one event:
>
> 32: Session topology :
> --- start ---
> templ file: /tmp/perf-test-vv5YzZ
> Using CPUID 0x00000000410fd070
> Opening: unknown-hardware:HG
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> perf_event_attr:
> type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
> config 0xb00000000
> disabled 1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> sys_perf_event_open: pid 0 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 4
> Opening: unknown-hardware:HG
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> perf_event_attr:
> type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
> config 0xa00000000
> disabled 1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> sys_perf_event_open: pid 0 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 5
> non matching sample_type
> FAILED tests/topology.c:73 can't get session
> ---- end ----
> Session topology: FAILED!
>
> This is because when re-opening the file and parsing the header, Perf
> expects that any file that has more than one event has the sample ID
> flag set. Perf record already sets the flag in a similar way when there
> is more than one event, so add the same logic to evlist__new_default().
>
> evlist__new_default() is only currently used in tests, so I don't
> expect this change to have any other side effects. The other tests that
> use it don't save and re-open the file so don't hit this issue.
>
> The session topology test has been failing on Arm big.LITTLE platforms
> since commit 251aa040244a ("perf parse-events: Wildcard most
> "numeric" events") when evlist__new_default() started opening multiple
> events for 'cycles'.
>
> Fixes: 251aa040244a ("perf parse-events: Wildcard most "numeric" events")
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAP-5=fWVQ-7ijjK3-w1q+k2WYVNHbAcejb-xY0ptbjRw476VKA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Tested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> Changes since v2:
>
> * Undo the fact that v2 was accidentally based on v1 instead of
> perf-tools
>
> Changes since v1:
>
> * Reduce scope of evsel variable
> * Add argument label
> * Change summary to be less specific about the failing test
> * Add the closes: tag
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> index 95f25e9fb994..979a6053a84d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,13 @@ struct evlist *evlist__new_default(void)
> evlist = NULL;
> }
>
> + if (evlist->core.nr_entries > 1) {

I think you need a NULL check for evlist here.

Thanks,
Namhyung


> + struct evsel *evsel;
> +
> + evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel)
> + evsel__set_sample_id(evsel, /*can_sample_identifier=*/false);
> + }
> +
> return evlist;
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>