Re: [PATCH 5/8] clk: qcom: support for duplicate freq in RCG2 freq table

From: Ziyang Huang
Date: Tue Jan 23 2024 - 10:53:49 EST


在 2024/1/23 1:34, Andrew Lunn 写道:
Change-Id: I97d9e1b55d8f3ee095f6f01729af527ba90e50e5
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
(cherry picked from commit 775e7d3b69ffc97afb5bd5a6c9c423f2f4d8a0b2)
Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Change-Id: If10193fc79a3c1375ab73597813745ff1f4df0ad

Pick from https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/qsdk/oss/kernel/linux-ipq-5.4/-/commit/6dfb368bae130bee58e00ddf8330b55066e1c8c5

Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Please clean up these tags. These Change-ID tags are meaningless in
mainline. 775e7d3b69ffc97afb5bd5a6c9c423f2f4d8a0b2 is not in mainline
either. The picked from might be interesting, but please put it into
the body of the commit message, not mixed in with the tags.

Who actually wrote this patch? The first Signed-off-by: is from
Abhishek Sahu. But you have a From of Praveenkumar I ?

I have no idea about this. This patch is from Qualcomm vendor linux code.

O.K. Since this is direct from the vendor, who probably does not track
code authorship correctly, i would say the author in git is probably
wrong. I would set the author: to Abhishek Sahu <absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.

What's more, I don't known how to deal with these commit message since I'm
not the author and I'm not sure do I have right to edit them even though
this is GPL code.

You should keep all the Signed-off-by, in the order they are. But the
Change-Id is meaningless, so there is no problem removing them.

Andrew

These days, I known a new knowledge: SGMII+ only support 2.5G. 1000M can't work with SGMII+ mode. So the 1000M frequency divided from 3.125G can be dropped. Then we don't have duplicated frequency and this patch is unnecessary. Will test my guess.