Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/01/2024 14:59, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95
>>
>> On 23/01/2024 14:08, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> Hi Conor, Krzysztof
>>>
>>> I replied you both here.
>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95
>>>>
>>>> On 21/01/2024 12:46, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Add i.MX95 clock dt-binding header file
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> This should be squashed with respective binding patch.
>>>
>>> i.MX95 use SCMI firmware, the SCP processor handles
>>> clock/power/pinmux/reset/performance and etc.
>>>
>>> I just add the index that SCMI exports, and Linux/UBoot will use the
>>> index and go through SCMI to do real HW configuration.
>>>
>>> In such case, should I still add HW information in a yaml binding doc?
>>> I am not sure what should be added if yes.
>>
>> Then why do you need it in the binding? I don't see any use of this.
> 
> ok, should I just add the clk index header in same folder as soc dtsi?

I don't know yet. How are these being used, except SCMI firmware?

Best regards,
Krzysztof